Concern

[pecunium]

Been a busy couple of days (and the modem died Tues. night, so I'm behind on all sorts of things, more detailed review of Noise Ninja, second draft of the review of the D2H, uploading pictures to LJ, sidereading, the usual).

But I did, in my quick skim of things this morning find, Possible clampdown on blogging.

If this ends up doing what CNET says it might (define the use of computers to do grassroots work, and links to campaigns) as contributions, worth the value of money raised, not the cost of time/equipment/money spent, blogging as we know it, is mostly dead.

Comments

[pecunium.livejournal.com]

Of course it might be as Iron Mouth claims, a bit of low-grade astroturfing (of a very subtle nature)

Are we doing Brad Smith's bidding?

I try to not jump on bandwagons (which is why my link-lists tend to be older news. It's stuff I want to see stay above the fold), and this is why.

On the up side, I can't really see any court letting this stand, if the FEC does rule this way.

I also can't see the Right Blogoshpere (which claims it has, "revolutionized" the world of news) standing for it. So, while I intend to keep my eye on it, I shant be writing any furious letters.

TK