Oi vey!

Dec. 1st, 2008 08:02 pm
pecunium: (Default)
[personal profile] pecunium
So, [personal profile] matociquala has a feature, wherein she informs us of the words Word didn't know.

I have long ago given up on the grammar checker in Word being able to keep track of subject/verb relationships when an intermediate phrase intrudes, but today I got one I just had to share. I was roughing out some text, and wrote the following (clunky) sentence.

One of my film bodies is an FE2, which has no mirror lock-up, but when I activate the self-timer the first thing to happen is the mirror flips up.

It needs some work, mostly in the last half. Word agreed with that assessement, kindly offering up this version instead.

One of my film bodies is an FE2, which has no mirror lock-up, but when I activate the self-timer the first thing to happen be the mirror flips up.

Right now, I'm tending toward something like this:

One of my film bodies is an FE2, which has no mirror lock-up, but the first thing to happen when I activate the self-timer is the mirror flipping up.

Date: 2008-12-02 03:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cakmpls.livejournal.com
I'm not going to make a suggestion--no, not because "this is what I do for pay; I don't give it away"!--because I'm not sure what you're getting at.

"One of my film bodies is an FE2, which has no mirror lock-up, but when I activate the self-timer the first thing to happen is the mirror flips up." The meaning of the "but" is ambiguous to me: does it mean "but that's no drawback because" or "but it has the weird feature that" or ...?

Maybe Word thinks you should use Ebonics; it thinks that "be," for a continuing or repetitive action (that is, the mirror be flipping up every time), would be the correct choice here.

Date: 2008-12-02 04:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] waterlilly.livejournal.com
I agree. It would help those of us whose cameras are of the "point it and shoot it" variety to understand what the action here is and why it's a problem.

I would also suggest breaking this into two sentences for clarity.

Date: 2008-12-02 07:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] antonia-tiger.livejournal.com
The flipping up of the mirror causes vibration, which can be a bad thing. Whne you use the self-timer the vibration has time to die away.

Date: 2008-12-02 11:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pecunium.livejournal.com
The point isn't the content of the sentence (it's part of a couple thousand words about issues relating to magnification and the difficulties it poses the photographer.

The point I was making is the verb choice Microsoft is asking me to make.

If I used the pattern they are suggesting, the previous sentence would be recast as, "The point I was making is the verb choice Microsoft be asking me to make."

Date: 2008-12-02 11:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pecunium.livejournal.com
Hey... someone who figured out I wasn't asking for advice, but pointing out the inanity of Microsofts suggestion.

I think (if I were forced to hazard a guess) it thinks I'm splitting an infinitive clause (not that I can see where it such a thing ought to be).

As to the intent, yes, the feature is such that the lack of a dedicated mirror lock-up isn't a drawback because of the idiosyncratic nature of the self-timer.

Profile

pecunium: (Default)
pecunium

June 2023

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
181920212223 24
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 26th, 2026 10:05 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios