So,
matociquala has a feature, wherein she informs us of the words Word didn't know.
I have long ago given up on the grammar checker in Word being able to keep track of subject/verb relationships when an intermediate phrase intrudes, but today I got one I just had to share. I was roughing out some text, and wrote the following (clunky) sentence.
One of my film bodies is an FE2, which has no mirror lock-up, but when I activate the self-timer the first thing to happen is the mirror flips up.
It needs some work, mostly in the last half. Word agreed with that assessement, kindly offering up this version instead.
One of my film bodies is an FE2, which has no mirror lock-up, but when I activate the self-timer the first thing to happen be the mirror flips up.
Right now, I'm tending toward something like this:
One of my film bodies is an FE2, which has no mirror lock-up, but the first thing to happen when I activate the self-timer is the mirror flipping up.
I have long ago given up on the grammar checker in Word being able to keep track of subject/verb relationships when an intermediate phrase intrudes, but today I got one I just had to share. I was roughing out some text, and wrote the following (clunky) sentence.
One of my film bodies is an FE2, which has no mirror lock-up, but when I activate the self-timer the first thing to happen is the mirror flips up.
It needs some work, mostly in the last half. Word agreed with that assessement, kindly offering up this version instead.
One of my film bodies is an FE2, which has no mirror lock-up, but when I activate the self-timer the first thing to happen be the mirror flips up.
Right now, I'm tending toward something like this:
One of my film bodies is an FE2, which has no mirror lock-up, but the first thing to happen when I activate the self-timer is the mirror flipping up.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 03:52 pm (UTC)"One of my film bodies is an FE2, which has no mirror lock-up, but when I activate the self-timer the first thing to happen is the mirror flips up." The meaning of the "but" is ambiguous to me: does it mean "but that's no drawback because" or "but it has the weird feature that" or ...?
Maybe Word thinks you should use Ebonics; it thinks that "be," for a continuing or repetitive action (that is, the mirror be flipping up every time), would be the correct choice here.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 04:42 pm (UTC)I would also suggest breaking this into two sentences for clarity.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 07:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 11:08 pm (UTC)The point I was making is the verb choice Microsoft is asking me to make.
If I used the pattern they are suggesting, the previous sentence would be recast as, "The point I was making is the verb choice Microsoft be asking me to make."
no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 11:03 pm (UTC)I think (if I were forced to hazard a guess) it thinks I'm splitting an infinitive clause (not that I can see where it such a thing ought to be).
As to the intent, yes, the feature is such that the lack of a dedicated mirror lock-up isn't a drawback because of the idiosyncratic nature of the self-timer.