Padlock, Upland Santa Cruz
Apr. 11th, 2008 12:32 pmWe were walking back from a trip up to the lava tubes in the highlands of Santa Cruz. We took a cab up, and walked back.
It's an exercise in how the camera can lie. What does the entire gate look like? What's the gate protecting? Ignoring the, apparent, condition of the wood (which is at a moderate premium on the islands) how secure is the area behind the gate?
The answers are: the gate is low (not quite four feet, as I recall), what's behind it is a yard, with some children's toys. Just down the way was an entrance to the yard, with no gate.
But it's still a nice photograph. I particularly like the way the wear from the chain is apparent

no subject
Date: 2008-04-11 09:50 pm (UTC)Too many people see the gear as the provider of craft. I see lots of shooters who do that, "If only I had "x", my pictures would be as good as "Y's". It's nonsense (much as I'm faunching for a D3). The equipment will improve the technical aspects of the photo. Clearer lenses mean cleaner shots, but the content, that's all the shooter.
The groups on flickr which are about holga, or diana, or pinhole photography (hrmn... I think I ought to make a pinhole for my digital. Time to buy some more body caps and a small sheet of .015 titanium), prove that it's not the top of the line which makes art possible.
But the people who think it is, will say, "yes, but think of what they could do with better gear,". At which point you have to just wash your hands. They'll get it, or they won't. When they do, they will have a lot more money to spend on going to places they can take good pictures.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-11 09:58 pm (UTC)