Date: 2009-02-28 01:15 am (UTC)
I think he expected to be able to completely explode the theory; to show how it couldn't exist.

Bear posited it (with all the baggage it entails) and he jumped on it.

At the start it might have been possible to discuss it. Because ruffling feathers wasn't the problem; failure to actually address the things offered up, and then the offensive comment, and the non-apolgies were the things which caused it to go so pear-shaped.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

pecunium: (Default)
pecunium

June 2023

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
181920212223 24
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 9th, 2025 11:48 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios