Those wacky flickr stats
Jan. 7th, 2009 07:14 pmThe nature of search engines is such that things you never would have expected can be used to find things.
Flickr has such a search engine, and this photo:

Was found in a really odd search string. Usually I can figure out how it comes to be that some strange thing leads to a picture (often it's from the .exif data), but this one....
corset or squeeze or cinch or gasp or suck or breath or pull or tight or lace or truss or strap or ouch
Plum escapes me.
I'm trying to work back to see how far into that string someone went before they found it. Mostly it's,safe for work (with some really interesting images), but there are those which are a tad risque; or past risque, so I'd not follow it from work, unless you set your filter to "safe"
Then again, looking under "recent" and "most intersting" gets a radically different set of images, which are safe for work; at least right now, and for the first dozen pages.
Flickr has such a search engine, and this photo:

Was found in a really odd search string. Usually I can figure out how it comes to be that some strange thing leads to a picture (often it's from the .exif data), but this one....
corset or squeeze or cinch or gasp or suck or breath or pull or tight or lace or truss or strap or ouch
Plum escapes me.
I'm trying to work back to see how far into that string someone went before they found it. Mostly it's,safe for work (with some really interesting images), but there are those which are a tad risque; or past risque, so I'd not follow it from work, unless you set your filter to "safe"
Then again, looking under "recent" and "most intersting" gets a radically different set of images, which are safe for work; at least right now, and for the first dozen pages.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-08 04:05 am (UTC)Hmmm... the "or" modifier could be used to create endless surprises. For example "nuclear or hamsters". You never know if you'll get a pool of toxic waste or a cute animal. Better yet, "nuclear or pinup or hamsters" :-)
Slideshow:
http://flickr.com/search/show/?q=nuclear+or+pinup+or+hamsters
no subject
Date: 2009-01-08 04:09 am (UTC)As to using that to "find" a picture, at present it's more than 1.5 million, so I suspect it's long odds to find something specific.
Better to have a more refined search.
And it's not "thanks to me", but thanks to flickr, which told me about it.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-08 04:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-08 04:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-08 05:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-08 04:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-08 04:13 am (UTC)This one, not so much.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-08 04:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-08 06:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-08 10:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-12 11:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-12 11:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 06:31 pm (UTC)