Date: 2004-10-18 03:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pecunium.livejournal.com

Sure, add away.

I'm of mixed opinions on the issues of direct vs. indirect democracy. Historical models imply that anything larger than about 5,000 people fall apart if the democratic function is direct (note that neither Britain, nor the States, which have the longest histories of democratic institutions; of present nations, saving Iceland, which is anomalous, in so many ways, do not have directly democratic systems. They elect people to represent them).

So the question becomes, at what level does one place the removal. The problem with professional lawmakers isn't that they are professional, it's that to get/stay on office anymore requires large amounts of capital. Which restricts access to office to those who are either well off, or can pander to those who are.

If that can be fixed, a lot of the problems would be fixed, and this question could be shelved.

TK

Profile

pecunium: (Default)
pecunium

June 2023

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
181920212223 24
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 25th, 2026 01:45 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios