I ya gotta be a loon....
Sep. 30th, 2004 08:41 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
pecuniumI am glad I happen to be this one:
Which Historical Lunatic Are You?
From the fecund loins of Rum and Monkey.
On the other hand... this loon Scalia on orgies and the 17th amendment (no, I'm not kidding)
Which Historical Lunatic Are You?
From the fecund loins of Rum and Monkey.
On the other hand... this loon Scalia on orgies and the 17th amendment (no, I'm not kidding)
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-09-30 09:44 pm (UTC)Scalia's entire holding in Bush v. Gore is diametrically opposed to his (longstanding) writings, speakings and utterances (to include previous decisions of the Supreme Court). His willingness to hear Bush v Gore on the grounds of equal protection was a huge red flag (combined with the Court creating the pretext, it not being present in the pleadings) we had strong indication that this case was not going to be heard on it's merits.
If anyone doubted it was a low and filty business the declared lack of precedentiary standing for the decision put the last nail in the coffin.
TK