I am suffering from the strange sense of abused/ashamed, silly, and angry.
About six weeks ago I shucked foolish pride and applied for food stamps. A about the beginning of Sept. they sent me a letter with an appointment date; today. I collected the various documents to prove that I was, in fact, poor; which was when I saw they had me being interviewed about Medi-Cal. Not only did I not apply for Medi-Cal, I am not eligible (because I am, for the same reaons I was applying for food stamps, completely covered by the VA).
So, at five minutes past eight I called my case worker and she said that wasn't a problem, she'd fix the coding, come in.
So I did. Saw the man at the desk, called her office, told her machine I was there. She came out, about the time my app't was scheduled, and told me they were still working on the food stamps vs. Medi-Cal issue.
About half an hour, and a couple more reassurances, they noticed what I'd not known when I filled out the application. East Palo Alto (where I live) is in San Mateo Cty. I'd applied in Santa Clara. No good. The money comes from the state, but the counties administer it, so my application wasn't valid.
I trundled my (more than a trifle disappointed/frustrated) self to the San Mateo Office, tolerably sure that by the time any benefits were being decided, the GI Bill would have arrived and I'd be collecting enough money that I'd be denied (because this go round has taken something like seven weeks).
But I filled it out, and waited around and got called back (which hadn't happened in Santa Clara; the San Mateo office was much quieter, and less haunted by despair and hopelessness, but I digress).
He's asking me questions (why I'd waited so long, etc.), and it seems I am going to get a fast turnaround grant (they can give you aid in as little as three days...), when I said I was in school.
Oops. Seems going to school, and being unemployed, makes one ineligble. One has to be available for full-time work, and a student is presumptively unable.
The only way around it is to have a job, which pays one a weekly wage equal to 20 hours of the federal minumum wage. The more time I spend at the margins of the system, the more I appreciate the parctical ways in which the poor are forced to stay poor. "Why don't they go to school, and improve themselves?"
Because if they do, they starve.
About six weeks ago I shucked foolish pride and applied for food stamps. A about the beginning of Sept. they sent me a letter with an appointment date; today. I collected the various documents to prove that I was, in fact, poor; which was when I saw they had me being interviewed about Medi-Cal. Not only did I not apply for Medi-Cal, I am not eligible (because I am, for the same reaons I was applying for food stamps, completely covered by the VA).
So, at five minutes past eight I called my case worker and she said that wasn't a problem, she'd fix the coding, come in.
So I did. Saw the man at the desk, called her office, told her machine I was there. She came out, about the time my app't was scheduled, and told me they were still working on the food stamps vs. Medi-Cal issue.
About half an hour, and a couple more reassurances, they noticed what I'd not known when I filled out the application. East Palo Alto (where I live) is in San Mateo Cty. I'd applied in Santa Clara. No good. The money comes from the state, but the counties administer it, so my application wasn't valid.
I trundled my (more than a trifle disappointed/frustrated) self to the San Mateo Office, tolerably sure that by the time any benefits were being decided, the GI Bill would have arrived and I'd be collecting enough money that I'd be denied (because this go round has taken something like seven weeks).
But I filled it out, and waited around and got called back (which hadn't happened in Santa Clara; the San Mateo office was much quieter, and less haunted by despair and hopelessness, but I digress).
He's asking me questions (why I'd waited so long, etc.), and it seems I am going to get a fast turnaround grant (they can give you aid in as little as three days...), when I said I was in school.
Oops. Seems going to school, and being unemployed, makes one ineligble. One has to be available for full-time work, and a student is presumptively unable.
The only way around it is to have a job, which pays one a weekly wage equal to 20 hours of the federal minumum wage. The more time I spend at the margins of the system, the more I appreciate the parctical ways in which the poor are forced to stay poor. "Why don't they go to school, and improve themselves?"
Because if they do, they starve.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 01:51 pm (UTC)Here through my Network page, FYI.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 06:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 06:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 09:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 12:09 am (UTC)If I went to school full-time and worked only part-time I'd not only starve, but have to file bankruptcy and give up my car which means I couldn't do either.
*hugs*
I completely understand and the system is totally broken.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 12:32 am (UTC)My friend
no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 12:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 12:42 am (UTC)I'll echo
no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 01:05 am (UTC)This time was easier, the real pill to swallow was filling out the first form. This was more abused, and ashamed that I was so crushed at being told I was 1: in the wrong office and 2:, "No Soup for YOU."
If I'd been in the right office the first go round, I might have had dedicated food money for the past two months. It would have been more than I needed, and I could have stocked up on bulk items (rice, beans, flour, some frozen meats), and been able to weather the painful gap in my GI Bill (which is running late, and may be another month to actually start arriving).
So I'm in Catch-22. Give up on school; and defer the GI Bill Stipend, so I can get half that much and be a able to accept the 40 hour a week job no one has offered me (something like 60 resumes out in the past two months, and the only answers have been a handful of, "We reviewed your application and went with someone else, we will look at it again if we get another openig, and another handful of scams).
The worst part is, I don't need much, and I don't need it for long; so the guilt of asking (when there are those who need it more dessperately than it seems to me I do) was hard to swallow. Then I get told I don't qualify because I don't have a job?
WTF?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Hot food in San Mateo County
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 12:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 01:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 01:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 01:54 am (UTC)Unfortunately starving because people are stupid and unimaginative is just as bad as starving because they're malicious.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 07:59 am (UTC)So there are people who are making these policy decisions to STOP giving people benefits, and they know what it means. They just don't care. They are probably Randites who think that people who are poor are cattle who don't deserve help anyway.
I am a big fan of not attributing to malice what can be explained by stupidity, but this is a kind of wilful stupidity that I have a hard time telling apart from malice. After all nobody thinks they're evil: they rationalize their choices telling themselves that it's tough love, or that taxpayer money should not go to the poor because they are by definition not deserveing and so on: still makes me want to spit on them.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 02:40 am (UTC)You live in EPA!?!? So did I until last March! Between the creek and 101.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 02:43 am (UTC)As to import, if I lived a mile west, things would be very different now.
Where are you now? (in general terms).
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 03:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 03:50 am (UTC)So I have to get lawyers and bankers to somehow cobble together a way for him to survive when we die. And hope that it doesn't change too much, and can be flexible enough so that he isn't fucked over when there isn't someone who loves him to sort out any paperwork.
It's horrible that a parent can't save for a child, especially one that may never be able to work or live alone. If it were up to me, the lion's share of what we have would go to him because he's the one most likely to need it. How could they do that to people? Kick their most vulnerable? Ensure he lives in near poverty until his death? How is that the right thing to do?
no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 04:01 am (UTC)I am sure there is a way to put it in trust, so that he doesn't "own" it, but it's all dedicated to taking care of him.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 05:04 am (UTC)At one point, my worker snapped at me and told me how annoyed she was that out of 50+ cases, she recognized my voice on her voicemail. How dare I demand actual time & attention from her! She has lots of other people to deal with! I should stop pestering her with questions about the meanings of auto-generated letters! (They kept sending me notes that my kid's medical coverage was going to be cut off. I'd call worker, and she'd assure me it wasn't; my case was in a weird spot between bureaucratic glitches, and the program that generated the cutoff warning letters didn't talk to the exceptions list.)
Erm. This was after the month I was late filing 'cos I gave birth and then two weeks later the baby was in the hospital; I called to make sure baby was covered, and she said, "I didn't know you were pregnant!" I bit my tongue and didn't say, "what, you didn't read THE APPLICATION FORM that explained why I was applying?" Of course she didn't. The last two workers I'd been transferred through hadn't seen fit to mention it to her, so it must not be important.
I suspect the welfare system is built on a premise of shame and hassle--they're hoping that one or the other of those, or both, keeps their numbers down.
Imagine being in your same circumstances--without good reading fluency. Or while tending a two-year-old child.
And yes, anything that makes it likely you could get out of poverty, cuts off the benefits before you can get there.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 07:50 am (UTC)Every time I hear about "benefit cheats" I want to hit somebody, and it's not the people on benefits.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 10:08 pm (UTC)People who complain about 'welfare queens' and 'benefit cheats' haven't ever had to even imagine being in a position where they would need public assistance, much less actually found themselves in one.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 09:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 09:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 09:55 pm (UTC)By people who knew I was a student, no less.
*sigh* It is a stupid system.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 10:49 pm (UTC)http://www.vetvoice.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=23D66EDEBDA4F92F659FFBF7FCFCBEC3?diaryId=3197
no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 11:31 pm (UTC)That's pretty sad man.
Date: 2009-10-28 03:33 pm (UTC)But it does not surprise me one bit. We all know how awfully pathetic the bureaucracy is, and how they deal with issues.
For example: "during the Northridge Earthquake, I saw many people from other countries getting food stamps, while driving BMWs and other nice cars.
But you, who actually needs some assistance, are given the run around.
But once again. If I act surprised and amazed and appalled, I would be lying and pretending.
Good luck Terry.
P.S.: can you enroll in SF for school? To far? Too much of a hassle? I'll be going through the same shit pretty soon and I feel your pain.
Re: That's pretty sad man.
Date: 2009-10-28 03:35 pm (UTC)People have no fucking shame.