May. 6th, 2005

Home again

May. 6th, 2005 12:14 pm
pecunium: (Default)
Home again
I was gone for about two-weeks. It's a strange thing to discover one has settled. I am, in many ways, a gypsy. I've moved, completely, up stakes and don't look back, almost a score of times in the past 20 years.

That doesn't count the short stints here and there, where the Army saw fit to send me someplace(s) for more than three weeks (though I am counting the three major moves during my wartime peregrinations, but not the smaller jumps we made from Kuwait to everywhere else in country).

Most of these have been fairly easy to take. Pack the bags and boxes, move; unpack the bags and boxes and call it a day.

So coming back from LA to discover that this was, in fact, home; that I was happier here than elsewhere, was pleasant.

I had free reign in the kitchen again(I have become very territorial about the kitchen... it is my part of the house and last night I was irked to find that I was irked at having been displaced for the evening. Not that I mind not cooking but it just sort of happened and the not knowing this was frustrating me because it was me, not Maia who was in the way).

Time in Pasadena was spent well enough. Did some minor yard work, tried to repair a spa. Having a leak, below the basin of a Jacuzzi is frustrating. Having it in PVC piping is more so. There are no threads, one uses hacksaws and glues, where regular plumbing would be almost trivial (a wrench and some teflon tape, with a bit of putty... problem solved). After two days feeling as though I was living in a trench (it rained while we were working on things, which made being in the hole all the more pleasant... you betcha), we still hadn't managed to repair the leak... which was just noticeable when the pump was at rest, but couldn't be missed when under pressure. But, because it was all done with PVC the actual working space was reduced.

If Barry and Michael can't fix it between now and when I am next down, well a low-clearance hacksaw and completely ripping out everything from that T-joint to the flexible PVC (which isn't all that flexible) will come out and I'll force the new piece so far in it barely needs the welding compound.

I also spent some time in the pottery lab. My joints weren't up to much, so I think I only kept one piece. It has a very nice shape, thin walled (about as thin as that clay can manage) and a decent flare to the lip of the bowl. It's smallish (I'm factoring in the shrinkage after firing) and I trimmed the base to a deep foot and thin bottom. I was afraid I'd be either too aggressive, or not enough, but when I asked Maia if she could guess how I knew to stop she said "the bottom started to fall in," and that was the answer, so I guess I did all right.

Barry and I also played with glaze. A Cone 06 raku (boring looking thing, sort of khaki colored) which was supposed to give a purple/turquoise break when reduced at Cone 10. PCC fires to 11, so we had great hopes. We also, looking at the formula, expected a runny effect. In that we were not disappointed. The bowl I fired has no evidence of either Barry's stamp, nor my mark. Filled in completely. Sadly the kiln didn't reduce much, so it is a verdigris color, with hints of purple and blue. Nicely textured, and with promise. Josh has been trying to get, "track stars" so we added some wood ash to the mix and we'll see what comes of it.

And when Maia goes down next she'll being back some of the mix, sans water, and we'll see how it fires at Cone 5.

Maia was down on Thurs., and we had dinner with friends of hers (her employers at the Faire). For reasons of politics I had to decline passes, but I did go and collect her on both days, which meant I got to take pictures of the birds at the lake (the faire moved, because they managed to piss off the county of the site they had before... seems to me they figured they were a big enough boon to the local economy that they could make like a sports team and expect concessions. They were wrong). I could do this because the Faire is ten minutes from her house, and because the new site prohibits camping, so for the first time in almost 30 years (perhaps since the beginning of the faire, some 37 years ago, there is no night-life).

That let me shop for her birthday present, which took two days, because the lesser part was trivial to find, but without the greater part it was pointless. I am not sure why I was so hellbent on getting it while we were down south, because 1: I had three weeks still to find it and 2: That increased the risk of her seeing it and 3: there is a shop in walking distance of the house which has it, but I had this silly quest.

So there I was on Sunday trying to find my preferred game-shop. I made the drive to Burbank, and parked. Things looked bad, because half the block on which the shop is located is being turned into town-homes. Having not been in recently, I wasn't completely sure they weren't a bit further on. They weren't, and the Burbank Town Center didn't have anyplace with it. Nor did it have a phone book. This makes the second time the building for this shop has been bulldozed. The last time was to build the Town Center.

I found a phone book, in the restaurant across from where I'd parked and drove the couple of miles to the new shop (less attractive, in all descriptions, than the most recent, which was probably the best of the four venues I've known them to inhabit), and bought the game.

So we headed home, jiggety-jig.

Monday we got the box from the Cal-Poly farm project. Kale, and beets, and onions and garlic and parsnips, and radishes and lettuces. There were also no small numbers of veggies from before I left, and while I was gone. Out comes the stock pot, in go the leafy greens, the celery and some onions. I also took a cleaver to the carrot we bought before I left (this carrot was about 2 lbs, measured just less than 5" across and about 10" long... it needed the cleaver) and simmered that with half a dozen parsnips (I'd never bothered with parsnips before... silly me. These were sweet, smooth fleshed and went soft in no time at all... they will make an interesting puree, perhaps as a side dish next week with the borshch) until they were filling the kitchen with sweet savor. Then in to the pot.

Dinner was perfumed rice with lamb. Parboil some basmati, and some lentils. Take a bit of yogurt and a bit less than half that of melted butter, mix this with about 3/4" inch of the rice and place in a deep pot; over a medium heat for about ten minutes.

Layer the rice and the lentils with dried fruits (I used currents and montmorency cherries, but dates and raisins are canonic, apricots would not be ill, prunes might be a little rich), in a slowly tapering mound. Sprinkle the rice layers with persian allspice (ground cardamom, cinnamon, cumin and saffron {I used about equal parts of cumin (2/3rds of which I toasted in a skillet first) and cardamom, 1/2 that of cinnamon and a healthy pinch of the saffron, all ground to a fine powder [as much as the saffron would grind]} in a deep mortar and pestle). The saffron in the mix will color, and flavor, some of the rice, so you get a few pearls of delicate red/yellow rice. Drizzle with the rest of the butter you melted (you can clarify the latter butter, but don't do that for the yogurt mix).

For the lamb I used about two lbs. left over from Passover. Since it had been cooked some of the classic steps were changed. If you have raw lamb brown it in some persian allspice, absent the saffron. Then cover with water and simmer with apricots (and maybe some dates/raisins) and a few whole peppercorns. You may want to cook this up ahead, it will do fine simmering on the back burner while the rice cooks.

When the rice is done, remove it from the stove and place it on a dishtowel, soaked in cool/cold water. This helps release the crust on the bottom (a non-stick pan helps too). When the steam stops, start ladling the rice into a bowl... fluff it as you go. At the bottom will be a crunchy disk, with luck you can get it out in only a couple of pieces (with a non-stick pot it can even be done in one). Break this into pieces and put one on each plate. Guests may help themselves to some of the stewed lamb.

One of the advantages (or not) of using lamb from the week before is the increase in the lambiness of the meat, as it rests after roasting. Since this had been roasted over coals, not baked, there was a small counterpoint of smokiness to go with the sweetness of the diced apricots. I thickened with a bit of cornstarch, because I started it about 30 minutes too late.

I started the bread the night before. I was trying for a na'an like bread again. So in addition to the sponge I used some old yogurt (this I have discovered is part of the secret). I did three batches, one with fresh dill, one with toasted cumin, and one plain. It was tasty, but I still had large loaves of pita. I'll figure it out yet.

Some tatziki (Fage yogurt, fresh garlic, and some dried cloves, cucumber) and the meal was complete.

The only thing which bothered me was the wine. I wanted to find some retsina, but the only place which might have some is all the way in SLO, and I forgot to have anyone check. I say the only place because everyplace nearby has not a drop.

The garden was in decent shape. I think the Thai Basil might recover, and I still have three plants (maybe four) of the 17 which used to be in the pot. I suspect a snail got to them. I have placed copper tape around the bottom of that pot. Not pretty (around the half-barrels it has a certain charm, on a red with black glossy glaze it looks terrible) but I want pesto, and pistou, and grilled cheese with basil sandwiches.

Weds. to the Farmers' Market in Arroyo Grande. We don't buy as much as we used to, because we get that box every week. On the other hand Maia and Alexa salvage the scraps, and feed them to rodents and rabbits. I bought an odd flower (Calceolaria Pocket book. It looks like a yellow snapdragon with a fat lip, and burst capillaries, or a cross between a snapdragon and a pitcher plant), as well as a number of small calla lilies with a dusky pink coloring.

Thursday night, at the larger market in Slo we bought a half-flat of strawberries (I think I'm making jam), a chardonnay grape (with two bunches of grapes on it) and some slow-growing basil (O sanctum ornamental, not used in cooking, according to the University of Ohio. I'll try it in some pesto and see if they are right).

It also turned out to be the Slo Wine and Food Festival so we watched (as the rain abated) a master cooper making some barrels. Sigh. A new barrel, suitable for actually storing things in, is only $350, if made from american oak. For French Oak (though I don't need it, since I'd not be aging wine, nor spirits in it) the cost is $900. I don't want to think what Limousin oak would run.

Today I'm going to make some beer bread with some of the last of Anchor Steam's 2004 Holiday Ale (I found almost two-cases worth while shopping for Passover, and couldn't justify buying more than one. If you should see any, grab it($11 dollars a six-pack and worth it, but $80 worth of beer was more than I thought I could get away with, esp. as I'd just bought $40 worth of wines at TJs, three Amarone and a BeerenAuslese). It is, in my opinion, the best year they've had in at least a decade and I'm curious as to how it will bake. I wish it was a live bottled beer, since I'd love to experiment with that. I'll have to buy some Red Tail Ale and see if it has any barm to it.




hit counter
pecunium: (Default)
I'm working with image files.

More to the point I am trying to make them postable to my LJ, so those of you who want to look at them, may.

We'll ignore the hassles of Photoshop (such as my not having managed to find the cancel command once I have contemplated a crop. I have to select another tool and say, "Don't Crop" or just commit and then undo, really annoying when I notice I've not duplicated the image. I could just ignore that, and use the master file (I shoot NEF, and that functions a lot as a negative would with film) but I'm afraid I'll not be able to find it easily. Do I want to be lazy, or paranoid... paranoia wins), because that's just part of the way things work. Darkroom work has it's quirky functions, so too Photoshop.

No, it's the measurement problem.

I've used lots of measureing systems in my day. Miles and klicks, meters and yards, inches and picas, 12 hour time and 24 hour time, Zulu and local, all of these are things I can use without more than the mental equivalent of flipping a switch. I can even jump around in terms of scale. Whole inches to .001ths, or even .0001 (which gets called tenths, but I digress), Navy watches to bells to real hours.

Which is why computers drive me buggy. To me a point is a concrete measure. 72 of them make an inch, 6 make a pica. Font designers have played hob with this (check for yourself. Take a half dozen fonts, at random, and print some sample words, side by side by side, at the same point size. See how much they vary) and it irritates me.

But image files are going to drive me mad.

I shoot a picture. It's a given size. My 4mb images are about 16x24 inches. That's a JPG. Photoshop tells me this is the size and damn if it ain't. So, that same file, as a TIFF, well Photoshop tells me it's about eight inches by ten.

Mind you when I look at them full sized, they are the same.

It's worse when I scan something. I take a slide. I scan it at 300 percent. That makes it 3x4.5. Which is what Photshop tells me. But if I look at the actual pixels it's more like 14x21. None of this would be so bad if I wasn't dealing with trying to keep the files viewable on most peoples monitors. I want a finished dimension with a maximum vertical of about 8", or a maximum horizontal of about 14". When one of them gets larger than that I reduce the size.

If I was working with JPGs for the parent image this would be trivial, because Photoshop gives me a 1:1 ratio for them. But no, I'm working with TIFFs, making the conversion at the last moment so as not to lose any more data than I have to, and those are all screwed up.

I'll stop whining now and go back to swearing as I work.

Intimations

May. 6th, 2005 04:02 pm
pecunium: (Default)
Yeah, I ought to be slaving away at Photoshop, but I'm still trying to catch up on todays f-list.

But I saw this quizzy thing on word usage and was amused by it. As expected most of the top 100 words in my journal are pedestrian a, an, the and so forth. But three of them stood out to me. I've italicized them.

Read into it what you will.


pecunium's Word Usage
1. the (1188) 26. this (102) 51. there (52) 76. don't (29)
2. to (595) 27. some (101) 52. been (49) 77. also (28)
3. of (588) 28. he (92) 53. an (48) 78. am (28)
4. and (536) 29. at (91) 54. no (48) 79. things (28)
5. a (513) 30. because (81) 55. out (46) 80. make (28)
6. i (335) 31. my (75) 56. what (46) 81. way (28)
7. in (320) 32. or (71) 57. any (45) 82. do (28)
8. it (249) 33. she (71) 58. if (44) 83. law (28)
9. is (226) 34. from (66) 59. will (43) 84. go (28)
10. that (211) 35. were (66) 60. being (43) 85. how (28)
11. was (180) 36. had (64) 61. her (40) 86. said (27)
12. for (162) 37. me (64) 62. people (39) 87. part (27)
13. as (140) 38. about (63) 63. would (37) 88. before (26)
14. but (133) 39. them (62) 64. only (37) 89. i'm (26)
15. not (133) 40. when (61) 65. like (37) 90. right (26)
16. which (123) 41. all (61) 66. much (36) 91. three (25)
17. be (122) 42. more (59) 67. up (35) 92. even (25)
18. with (122) 43. can (58) 68. get (35) 93. good (25)
19. we (120) 44. you (57) 69. well (35) 94. got (25)
20. they (120) 45. by (54) 70. time (34) 95. i've (25)
21. on (113) 46. has (54) 71. other (33) 96. constitution (25)
22. are (110) 47. those (54) 72. just (33) 97. see (25)
23. one (108) 48. who (54) 73. two (32) 98. made (23)
24. so (108) 49. his (53) 74. it's (31) 99. court (23)
25. have (107) 50. than (52) 75. him (30) 100. think (23)
Username:
Word Count by Hutta.

Chain Links

May. 6th, 2005 04:14 pm
pecunium: (Default)
Bits and pieces of things which amused or (more likely) irritated and infuriated me.

First up H.R.418
REAL ID Act of 2005 (Referred to Senate Committee after being Received from House)


That means the House has passed it, and the Senate is looking at it.

It's a lousy piece of legislation to begin with, being an intrusion of the Federal Gov't into the States prerogative, and not funded in the least.

But the kicker is here
SEC. 102. WAIVER OF LAWS NECESSARY FOR IMPROVEMENT OF BARRIERS AT BORDERS.

Section 102(c) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1103 note) is amended to read as follows:

`(c) Waiver-

`(1) IN GENERAL- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall have the authority to waive, and shall waive, all laws such Secretary, in such Secretary's sole discretion, determines necessary to ensure expeditious construction of the barriers and roads under this section.

`(2) NO JUDICIAL REVIEW- Notwithstanding any other provision of law (statutory or nonstatutory), no court, administrative agency, or other entity shall have jurisdiction--

`(A) to hear any cause or claim arising from any action undertaken, or any decision made, by the Secretary of Homeland Security pursuant to paragraph (1); or

`(B) to order compensatory, declaratory, injunctive, equitable, or any other relief for damage alleged to arise from any such action or decision.'.


They've tried this before. It's carte blanche to the SecHomDef. Read it again. He can do whatever he likes, so long as he claims it's to secure the borders. It also bans the courts from reviewing his actions.

That bit about notwithstanding any other provision of the law is a fig leaf, but if you look at it, the leaf is pretty tattered, since the Secretary's sole discretion is the ruling factor. He can disregard the advice of anyone he likes (to assume, on the face of it, his boss, the president, who can fire him, but not; looking at the text, countermand him).

I don't advocate often, but call your senator. Even if you like the law itself, get them to refuse to allow that passage in the Senate version, and insist that it not be approved in conference committee, so long as the House language remains.

That this is the second piece of legislation, I know of, to include this language makes me think the White House wants it, a lot. That concerns me.

Next:

The House and Senate, have seen fit to define "woman" as

`(6) WOMAN- The term `woman' means a female human being who is capable of becoming pregnant, whether or not she has reached the age of majority.


That's in Senate Bill 51 and H.R.356
Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act of 2005 (Introduced in House)

In context of that legislation it makes a certain amount of sense. It's needless language, since one of the things the law requires is that the women affected be pregnant. If she isn't the provisions don't apply. The law isn't heinous on its face, just in its subtle purpose, which is to make the getting of abortions even more traumatic, by telling women they are inflicting terrible trauma on the fetus. It would be more to the point, if the pain the fetus might suffer were the case, to make it a requirement that anesthesia be administered, rather than issuing brochures and making women choose. On the other hand, that would raise the costs across the board, and so perhaps not have the desired effect (which is what I assume it to be from the list of sponsors) of making it less likely women get abortions. It might be better to focus on preventing the cause of unwanted pregnancies, but that's a whole 'nother issue.

Which brings up the issue of sex, or more to the point, gender roles as seen by folks like Santorum.

Sex a weapon from Nerve.com discusses how the "Men's Movement" of the Religious Right is using the Bible, and their interpretations of how men are supposed to treat, and be treated. Among other things it discusses the way they see equality as dangerous. This lack of comfort with equality in the home leads to a lack of comfort in it in the world at large. Someone has to be in charge, and that someone is always them.

One of the great proponents of this, "Headship" is James Dobson. If he were some small-town preacher this would be one thing, but he isn't. He has the president's ear, and his group, "Focus on the Family" seems to be more acceptable than the UCC, because they got an ad on Nanny 911 (or whatever it's called) on ABC, even though the UCC was too controversial.

Dobson, for those who don't know, went a few rounds with his dachshund, he got the better of it, but it was, to read his account, nip and tuck, touch and go; he did win, but it might not have been possible without the leather belt he got... before he started.

My description of it can't do it justice, so I'll let Dr. Dobson (not a Th.D, but rather a Ph.D, in Psych...) speak for himself.

"Please don't misunderstand me. Siggie is a member of our family and we love him dearly. And despite his anarchistic nature, I have finally taught him to obey a few simple commands. However, we had some classic battles before he reluctantly yielded to my authority.

"The greatest confrontation occurred a few years ago when I had been in Miami for a three-day conference. I returned to observe that Siggie had become boss of the house while I was gone. But I didn't realize until later that evening just how strongly he felt about his new position as Captain.

"At eleven o'clock that night, I told Siggie to go get into his bed, which is a permanent enclosure in the family room. For six years I had given him that order at the end of each day, and for six years Siggie had obeyed.

"On this occasion, however, he refused to budge. You see, he was in the bathroom, seated comfortably on the furry lid of the toilet seat. That is his favorite spot in the house, because it allows him to bask in the warmth of a nearby electric heater..."

"When I told Sigmund to leave his warm seat and go to bed, he flattened his ears and slowly turned his head toward me. He deliberately braced himself by placing one paw on the edge of the furry lid, then hunched his shoulders, raised his lips to reveal the molars on both sides, and uttered his most threatening growl. That was Siggie's way of saying. "Get lost!"

"I had seen this defiant mood before, and knew there was only one way to deal with it. The ONLY way to make Siggie obey is to threaten him with destruction. Nothing else works. I turned and went to my closet and got a small belt to help me "reason" with Mr. Freud."

What developed next is impossible to describe. That tiny dog and I had the most vicious fight ever staged between man and beast. I fought him up one wall and down the other, with both of us scratching and clawing and growling and swinging the belt. I am embarrassed by the memory of the entire scene. Inch by inch I moved him toward the family room and his bed. As a final desperate maneuver, Siggie backed into the corner for one last snarling stand. I eventually got him to bed, only because I outweighed him 200 to 12!"


For more enlightening commentary I commend the comments in And while we’re in the business at Electrolite


And, lest we think religion, and the religious are interested in tolerance, there's the church in NC whose pastor kicked nine people out for not publicly declaring they supported Bush. He read them out from the pulpit, and said any Democrat who didn't vote for Bush, or at least come up the altar and confess the sin of not so voting (interesting that, as reported, he doesn't conceive a Republican might have gone for the other side) was to leave the church and resign all offices. Forty-nine people left.

Me, I'd've stood up, being a registered Republican and all, and walked to the altar, allowed as I didn't get to vote, and taken a quarter out of my pocket. I'd've asked the preacher who he saw on the coin. Then I'd've walked to the door, taken my shoes off, clapped the dust from them and left.

But it isn't just small churches and people of little influence, nope Rush Limbaugh said I am worse than a bad Christian, he said I despise God.

LIMBAUGH: "I would submit to you that people on the left are religious, too. Their God is just different. The left has a different God. There's a religious left in this country.

"And, the religious left in this country hates and despises the God of Christianity and Catholicism and whatever else. They despise it because they fear it, because it's a threat, because that God has moral absolutes. That God has right and wrong, that God doesn't deal in nuance, that God doesn't deal in gray area, that God says, 'This is right and that is wrong.'


You can find the whole transcript on the 27th of April.

Limbaugh, however, didn't stop himself there, no he treated his 20 million member audience to some rollicking good times on the subject of Abu Ghraib.

CALLER: Just to keep you with the season, I want to wish you a Happy Abu Ghraib. And I apologize that I didn’t get my Abu Ghraib present in the mail. I was wondering what I could get you for Abu Ghraib this year and how are you going to decorate your Abu Ghraib tree sir?

RUSH: You want to know what to get me for Abu Ghraib? You know what? That is a good question. I don’t really want anything for Abu Ghraib. The Democrats, that is who we need to get presents for. One thing, have you thought about handcuffs? Those have multiple uses for Democrats. A whip. You know, to go along with the handcuffs. Dawn says a good present would be to give a Democrat a digital camera so that he or she can document their own atrocities. All you have to take it to a Madonna concert. You got the whips, and the handcuffs and chains right there on stage and people are paying for this.

CALLER: They may have military intelligence, Rush. Who knows?

RUSH: That is a great question. What kind of gift to give Democrats here on the anniversary of Abu Ghraib. I’m glad you called, Christopher.

We’ll think of more as they, as they come up. You know, you might give them a little pyramid game, something that is in the shape of a pyramid. Wire tap kit. Could borrow that. Ted, actually could borrow one from Raymond Reggie, a wire tap kit. What else? Autographed picture of Mary Mapes. Boy, if you could score, come up with an autograph of Mary Mapes, she’s the mother of the Abu Ghraib scandal. Jumper cables. A pair of jumper cables—superb idea, Mr. Maimone. And these are things we all have lying around the house, folks. Just get rid of it. It is junk. Give them a German shepherd. Oh, yeah, a German shepherd dog, little German shepherd puppy. You can train yourself.


And this man gets to speak at the Republican Convention.

Pat Robertson, however, well he thinks the gravest danger to America, ever, is the Supreme Court. In his words

"They're destroying the fabric that holds our nation together." His interviewer, George Stephanopolous, asked whether Robertson was saying that the threat posed by federal judges was more dire than the Civil War, World War II, and the terrorists who struck on Sept. 11. Robertson replied: "I really believe that. ... I think that the gradual erosion of the consensus that's held our country together is probably more serious than a few bearded terrorists who fly into buildings."

And, on that somber note, I'll put this to bed.

Profile

pecunium: (Default)
pecunium

June 2023

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
181920212223 24
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 8th, 2026 09:30 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios