A question re L'affaire Plame
Oct. 18th, 2005 07:46 amOk, this has been bothering me since the whole thing started.
Wilson goes to Niger. He comes back, and thinks the Administration isn't playing fair with the facts.
Someone decides he's a loose cannon and needs to be discredited.
So far it all makes sense; but the next part is where I get lost, how was outing his wife supposed to discredit what he had to say? Were we supposed to think he was incapable of rational thought because his wife might have gotten him assigned to look for info? This was, after all her baliwick... so perhaps he was to dense to see the facts, and she had to spoon feed him? Or is it that her being a covert operative in some way so thorouhgly emasculates him that we can't believe what he says?
That's the part that bothers me? What real effect was supposed to come from this revelation (other than perhaps putting some people in the White House at risk of criminal charges)? I can't see anything coming out of such a plan which would actually do the White House any good.
Maybe it was a secret ploy on Bush's part to get out from under Rove's thumb, and a brilliant plan (a la the ending of, The Sting) is coming together.
But I doubt it.
Wilson goes to Niger. He comes back, and thinks the Administration isn't playing fair with the facts.
Someone decides he's a loose cannon and needs to be discredited.
So far it all makes sense; but the next part is where I get lost, how was outing his wife supposed to discredit what he had to say? Were we supposed to think he was incapable of rational thought because his wife might have gotten him assigned to look for info? This was, after all her baliwick... so perhaps he was to dense to see the facts, and she had to spoon feed him? Or is it that her being a covert operative in some way so thorouhgly emasculates him that we can't believe what he says?
That's the part that bothers me? What real effect was supposed to come from this revelation (other than perhaps putting some people in the White House at risk of criminal charges)? I can't see anything coming out of such a plan which would actually do the White House any good.
Maybe it was a secret ploy on Bush's part to get out from under Rove's thumb, and a brilliant plan (a la the ending of, The Sting) is coming together.
But I doubt it.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 02:57 pm (UTC)It was also supposed to discredit him by showing that he and his wife both have an axe to grind with this administration, and they went looking for something to "lie" about.
Mostly, it was just more of Rove and Libby's brand of dirty revenge politics.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 03:02 pm (UTC)TK
no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 03:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 03:06 pm (UTC)Me, I expected it to whither on the vine (and a call from Cheney's office to Ashcroft may have been the start of the coffin that Judy Miller probably nailed shut with her lame-ass explanations of her mysteriously unknown, then rediscovered (in her desk, of all places) notebook, with the quotation from an unkown source; revealing Plame's name.
Before Wilson came out with his views.
Her apparent possession of Secret clearance is another matter altogether; to say nothing of her apparent improprieties in the field.
TK
no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 03:10 pm (UTC)The Missle Gap? The CIA said it was nonsense.
Hordes of sleeper cells in the US? The CIA said it was nonsense.
Iranian moderates, whom we could bribe into power with weapons? The CIA said it was nonsense.
Iraq as a player in the Al Qaeda jihad? The CIA said it was nonsense.
So the CIA has to go, and now they want to give John "I never so much as heard of death squads" Negroponte absolute control over them.
TK
no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 03:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 03:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 03:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 03:33 pm (UTC)The inferred charges were twofold
a) Nepotism and corruption. Wilson couldn't have got the job unless Plame gave him this tasty little holiday (actual details of the job would, of course, invite questions as to why the hell someone would think Niger was the ideal cushy holiday destination, but I digress)
b) Appeals to sexism. "Hah, Wilson got told what to do by his WIFE. His WIFE earns more money than him, probably. He's not a REAL MAN."
There's still a significant portion of the country for whom that kind of thing matters.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 03:37 pm (UTC)She was an NOC... which means she was patriotic, but may not have been nationalist. She was also probably apolitical (and tending toward moderate). Since she was an NOC, in proliferation, she was certainly more dovish than the present White House.
TK
no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 03:40 pm (UTC)I think keelhauling is too good for outing an agent. The collateral damage (forget that she can't work anymore, and that all her contacts/sources are burned... and that on proliferation) is immense. I can guarantee that people in other countries; some of them probably innocent, are in prison, and dead, because her name was outed.
Pisses me off doesn't begin to cover my sentiments.
TK
no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 03:43 pm (UTC)That's sort of like the black hole calling the kettle black.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 03:56 pm (UTC)And also that you probably have the first idea about Niger and how it's not most nepotists first pick. ("hey honey, happy birthday, you get to go to Niger all by yourself and talk to people about Uranium!" "Are you still mad about those shelves? I'll put them up when I get time!")
no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 05:24 pm (UTC)Wilson goes to Niger and discredits the yellowcake story.
Bush mentions the yellowcake story in the State of the Union several months later.
Wilson goes public and says 1) The yellowcake story is bullshit 2) They know it's bullshit because they were the ones who asked me to go.
Novak writes "they didn't know the story was bullshit because we weren't the ones who sent you."
Wilson says "who the hell sent me to Niger, then?"
Novak writes "um, your wife is involved in the relevant CIA agency. She sent you."
Wilson's wife was an explanation for why Bush didn't know about Wilson's report. It also adds hints of nepotism and sexism: decorating an excuse with unsavory overtones too unseemly to overtly mention is a Rove trademark. (Ex: McCain's black baby.)
Blowing her cover is a huge issue, but as a related issue I'd be curious whether anyone has shown that the ostensible reason for outing Plame was dead wrong. I.E. regardless of who actually sent Wilson to Niger the White House *did* get the report and *did* know that he'd discredited it before the State of the Union.
I think it is much simpler than all that
Date: 2005-10-18 06:28 pm (UTC)Susan in St. Paul
no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 06:33 pm (UTC)Re: I think it is much simpler than all that
Date: 2005-10-18 07:02 pm (UTC)TK
no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 07:03 pm (UTC)TK
no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 07:05 pm (UTC)I am the target audience for whom they want to discredit Wilson, so the whole play seems worse than a bungle, it seems stupid.
TK
no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 07:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 11:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-18 11:51 pm (UTC)Sniper shot from the point of view of the insurgents.
Must have had plating. Seems like it was a rifle round and it didn't penetrate. This is why you wear body armor.
http://www.strategypage.com/gallery/articles/military_photos_20057170.asp
no subject
Date: 2005-10-19 12:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-19 04:42 am (UTC)http://www.unoriginal.co.uk/footage52_5.html