![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I was tired yesterday, and forgot to upload some of the picture I meant to put in the Grab Bag so that's been done.
I also forgot to mention one of the features of Noise Ninja. When told to batch process folders, it adds a new sub-folder with the changed files. It doesn't overwrite them, it makes copies, with "filtered" added to the name. Since the new files are in a folder, in the old folder, they are easy to find.
But it does use space. Not a big deal if one is editing images and then correcting them, and not a big deal if one is only shooting a few hundred pictures a month. For me, well it means I have to go back and decide about keeping the originals (when using nothing but JPG as the original format) and I need to get more storage, for keeping the RAW files, and the, secondary, files; after corrections.
I also forgot to mention one of the features of Noise Ninja. When told to batch process folders, it adds a new sub-folder with the changed files. It doesn't overwrite them, it makes copies, with "filtered" added to the name. Since the new files are in a folder, in the old folder, they are easy to find.
But it does use space. Not a big deal if one is editing images and then correcting them, and not a big deal if one is only shooting a few hundred pictures a month. For me, well it means I have to go back and decide about keeping the originals (when using nothing but JPG as the original format) and I need to get more storage, for keeping the RAW files, and the, secondary, files; after corrections.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-27 10:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-27 11:03 pm (UTC)That doesn't really solve all the problems of storage, since a good stock arrangement (which is what I'm working on) needs something a bit more fluid than disks, but then again it might be handy for sending clients low-res images in the categories they're interested in.
TK
no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 07:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 03:39 pm (UTC)The killer is the scans, (when a scan of a 1x1/12 inch slide = 400mb, and I have at least a few hundred of those I'll want to scan, it can still fill a lot of space. If I elect to scan all of the one I like [as opposed to those I think salable) it could take a LOT of space).
TK
no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 01:37 am (UTC)Yes, I know I could do it all myself, but I can also change the oil in a car but I had people do that for me, too.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 04:28 am (UTC)More to the point, I am not willing to trust a remote service to 1: store my images and 2: prevent my copyright from being lost.
This is more important than the oil in my car, which for reasons of hassle I am about 50/50 for getting other to do vs. doing it myself.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-28 04:37 am (UTC)I do understand the copyright thing. Smugmug does have it to disable right mouse click, put a watermark on, let people view only small versions, but yeah I can understand being worried about a remote source. That's why I really should whip out the credit card RIGHT NOW and order those #$%! backups.
I just wish I paid attention to my backups I made myself, I had a CD deteriorate and now I cant get the pictures off it.