Research

[pecunium]

I've been thinking about the cost of art, and that prints are trivial. They also take up space (some of which might be better served with bookshelves). But there are other options, and I've been thinking about them. In the course of looking into them it occurs to me that before I invest my time and energy in setting up a CafePress or Zazzle shop (and of the two I think I like Zazzle a bit better, any reviews people have of the two would be greatly appreciated), it might behoove me to see what, if any interest there is in derivative works from my photos.

So I present you with a poll.


[Poll #1246044]

Comments

[marydell.livejournal.com]

www.digitalblasphemy.com is a site that has wallpapers (digital renders, not photos) that people subscribe to. That might be a model for you to explore, in addition to selling prints & printed items.

[don-fitch.livejournal.com]

Explanation of my "Not Interested": I can't think of any of your photos -- which are generally excellent/admirable -- that I've seen that would not suffer ...ummm... between 50% and 90% loss of quality if reproduced in the media mentioned. That would be, for me, Too Much.

[discoflamingo.livejournal.com]

I have digitalblasphemy prints from Zazzle as the primary artwork in my apartment. I think the creator there has a really good thing going on.