Sigh...

Aug. 30th, 2005 03:18 pm
pecunium: (Default)
[personal profile] pecunium
What's wrong with these pictures?





Nothing, right?

Well, if you go and look at them here and here you will see that the couple in the first picture are just grabbing needed food, where the kid in the second has looted a grocery.

The only differences I can see between them are the color of their skin, and the bag of food the kid has (and the guy has a knapsack, so it's possible they have more than a "bottle of milk, a loaf of bread and come home right away." Absent knowledge of what's in the bag, and of how many people the kid might be taking it too; or of when he might be rescued, I'm willing to cut him the same slack the ones in the top picture get.

The food in those groceries is doomed. The perishables will perish and the semi-durable (canned goods) will probably be unsalvageable by the time they get the waters out of the city for not only are the pumps not capable of more than an inch an hour (as I recall reading) but they put the water into Lake Ponchartrain, which would be, until they repair the levee breaches, a Sysiphean task, since it will just run right back into town, charging anyone with looting; for food, is pointless, but the distinctions made here... sigh.



hit counter

Date: 2005-08-30 11:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pecunium.livejournal.com
Excuse me? Not conspiracy.

On the all too human assumption that I'm average (which I'm not) I, who have black family, saw a white woman.

As to conspiracy? No, I see it as lazy frames of reference. The folks at Yahoo haven't set a policy and the guy who wrote the cutline on the black kid is product of a culture which assumes blacks, as a class, are more likely to steal, and so calls it looting.

I don't posit intent, nor yet concerted action. I'm observing a difference.

Now, if you can tell me what the difference is, in those pictures, which makes one looting, and not the other, then things are different, but I sure as hell can't see one.

TK

Date: 2005-08-30 11:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spimby.livejournal.com
I deleted that comment, as I thought it inappropriate for a stranger's journal. I apologize for it.

"Now, if you can tell me what the difference is, in those pictures, which makes one looting, and not the other, then things are different, but I sure as hell can't see one."

I have no idea. Maybe the people in the top picture had food handed to them by cops who commandeered the store (which is happening) and the one on the bottom smashed and grabbed and got his picture taken right after. None of us knows, so... I think you're digging for an offense by contrasting those two pictures and speculating that there's a racial motive behind the captions.

Date: 2005-08-30 11:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pecunium.livejournal.com
The the cutline needs to say so. But it doesn't, which means all we have is what we see.

As an editor (which I've been) I'd have spiked the looting caption, because until someone is convicted, that's a libel.

TK

Profile

pecunium: (Default)
pecunium

June 2023

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
181920212223 24
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 25th, 2025 10:06 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios