Amusing myself with spammers
Feb. 26th, 2005 07:10 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I, as so many do, get told by banks with which I have no account (oddly no one has hit me from my actual bank, go figure) telling me these non-existent accounts have been compromised.
Of course what they want me to do is log in and tell them all about myself.
So I oblige them.
I enter fake names, rude passwords, SSN which are not mine, bogus card numbers and non-existent pins.
But the one today from Huntington bank (which I got at two seperate e-mail accounts) was perfect. It had the last four digits of my card on it (XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-4747).
How, in the name of all that's reasonable, can they figure people won't look and see that the numbers don't match (they have a 1/10,000 chance of being right).
Or is my, admittedly low, estimation of the average intellect still too high?
Of course what they want me to do is log in and tell them all about myself.
So I oblige them.
I enter fake names, rude passwords, SSN which are not mine, bogus card numbers and non-existent pins.
But the one today from Huntington bank (which I got at two seperate e-mail accounts) was perfect. It had the last four digits of my card on it (XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-4747).
How, in the name of all that's reasonable, can they figure people won't look and see that the numbers don't match (they have a 1/10,000 chance of being right).
Or is my, admittedly low, estimation of the average intellect still too high?
no subject
Date: 2005-02-27 03:57 am (UTC)This, however, is spoken from the viewpoint of someone who did dial-up customer support in the early days of the internet.
After answering questions about the "any" key and pointing out that passwords were case sensitive, I'd believe just about anything that pointed to the cluelessness (clue server: connection refused) of the general populace.
Add in an allergy to numbers, because after all, numbers relate to math and math is difficult and evil.
/me wanders off mumbling because she knows her account numbers, credit card numbers, and bank balances (within pennies) without even thinking too hard about it.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-27 04:20 am (UTC)TK
no subject
Date: 2005-02-27 04:45 am (UTC)--K
Peoples iz dum indeedy
Date: 2005-02-27 05:31 am (UTC)I don't think you'll go broke underestimating the intelligence of the public. People seem more doltish by the hour. Today some kid pointed at a computer we were looking at over at Fry's electronics and told his dad that was the one he wanted. The salesman hurried over to stop this outrage. "Oh, no," he assured the parent. "That one has Linus [sic] on it. And you can't install Windows on it, or it'll destroy the motherboard."
[facepalm]
The salesman led them to a not-on-sale system which the dad immediately "knew" was better.
[headbanging]
Re: Peoples iz dum indeedy
Date: 2005-02-27 07:05 pm (UTC)I know, at a basic level, that people are not the brightest. I did journalism, then I did studio work (some great people, and some of the stupidist louts you can imagine) as a projectionist. If I never see another mid-career director trying to make his break-out picture, I'll be happy.
Then to the Army, where my line of work is about exploiting people's fears and weaknesses.
No, I am aware that one can see a lot of numbskull in the world. But this... this just croggles me. Not that someone would prey on the credulity of people. That's as old as people.
But that they would include a means of verifying the falsity of the claim they make. I just figured them for smarter than that.
As a photographer, well we won't speak to sales pitches.
TK
no subject
Date: 2005-03-03 12:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-03 04:31 am (UTC)If you are worried, change your password, and check your credit every couple of months.
Don't ever fill one of these forms out (or at least don't do it with legitimate info).
TK