My letter to John McCain
Sep. 25th, 2006 01:57 amSenator,
I am disgusted. Your recent attempt to pretend you are defending prisoners of war appalls me.
The language of your bill puts it completely in the power of the president to decide what is torture (who admits to wanting to allow techniques we called toture when the Soviets used them, who admits to having his agents use those techniques), and makes it impossible (because of the court stripping language, and the retroactivity clause) for the courts to review those cases.
I am an interrogtor, and I am aghast that you, of all people, would sanction such a thing.
You have broken faith with your fellows, those who were imprisoned with you in Hanoi, and those who will be imprisoned in the future. You are breaking faith with the principles of the nation, which demand fair treatment for all; presume innoncence of the arrested and requires that we uphold not just the letter, but the spirit of the treaties we sign.
When you complain that places like the NYTimes and the ACLU are calling it sanctioning of torture, well it's clear to me that I am not one of the people you think will recognise it as making me any safer.
I think, in fact, it not only makes my job harder, but it makes my fellow soldiers less safe, and does absolutely nothing to protect the people of the United States.
Where once you had my respect, you have now earned my contempt.
I am disgusted. Your recent attempt to pretend you are defending prisoners of war appalls me.
The language of your bill puts it completely in the power of the president to decide what is torture (who admits to wanting to allow techniques we called toture when the Soviets used them, who admits to having his agents use those techniques), and makes it impossible (because of the court stripping language, and the retroactivity clause) for the courts to review those cases.
I am an interrogtor, and I am aghast that you, of all people, would sanction such a thing.
You have broken faith with your fellows, those who were imprisoned with you in Hanoi, and those who will be imprisoned in the future. You are breaking faith with the principles of the nation, which demand fair treatment for all; presume innoncence of the arrested and requires that we uphold not just the letter, but the spirit of the treaties we sign.
When you complain that places like the NYTimes and the ACLU are calling it sanctioning of torture, well it's clear to me that I am not one of the people you think will recognise it as making me any safer.
I think, in fact, it not only makes my job harder, but it makes my fellow soldiers less safe, and does absolutely nothing to protect the people of the United States.
Where once you had my respect, you have now earned my contempt.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 11:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 11:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 11:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 01:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 01:58 pm (UTC)I just Did It To You again.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 02:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 02:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 02:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 03:09 pm (UTC)---L.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 04:15 pm (UTC)TK
no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 04:15 pm (UTC)At least you aren't trolling me, which has happened from time to time.
TK
no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 04:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 04:28 pm (UTC)Something in those ought to help you.
If it's just finding his e-mail, http//mccain.senate.gov is what I used.
You have to give an Arizona addres (this is more irksome when I am trying to write people whose jobs in the house/senate, mean they represent more than just their constituents) but that's about all.
When I write to a committee chair, or leader, I use 1234 Main Street, and tell them I am writing them in their extra-duty job.
For things like McCain, where it's a personal thing, I just use an address. Since I lived in Phoenix for a summer, I just use my old address, he can figure out if it's supposed to be St, or Ave.
TK
no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 04:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 05:21 pm (UTC)Wild applause.
DV
no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 05:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 06:24 pm (UTC)---L.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 06:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 06:30 pm (UTC)TK
no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 07:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 07:20 pm (UTC)But the cc would still be good.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 07:26 pm (UTC)Well said, and bravely done.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 07:36 pm (UTC)Flattered, I'll see what Maia has to say on the matter.
TK
no subject
Date: 2006-09-25 10:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-26 12:59 am (UTC)