Sigh...
What's wrong with these pictures?


Nothing, right?
Well, if you go and look at them here and here you will see that the couple in the first picture are just grabbing needed food, where the kid in the second has looted a grocery.
The only differences I can see between them are the color of their skin, and the bag of food the kid has (and the guy has a knapsack, so it's possible they have more than a "bottle of milk, a loaf of bread and come home right away." Absent knowledge of what's in the bag, and of how many people the kid might be taking it too; or of when he might be rescued, I'm willing to cut him the same slack the ones in the top picture get.
The food in those groceries is doomed. The perishables will perish and the semi-durable (canned goods) will probably be unsalvageable by the time they get the waters out of the city for not only are the pumps not capable of more than an inch an hour (as I recall reading) but they put the water into Lake Ponchartrain, which would be, until they repair the levee breaches, a Sysiphean task, since it will just run right back into town, charging anyone with looting; for food, is pointless, but the distinctions made here... sigh.


Nothing, right?
Well, if you go and look at them here and here you will see that the couple in the first picture are just grabbing needed food, where the kid in the second has looted a grocery.
The only differences I can see between them are the color of their skin, and the bag of food the kid has (and the guy has a knapsack, so it's possible they have more than a "bottle of milk, a loaf of bread and come home right away." Absent knowledge of what's in the bag, and of how many people the kid might be taking it too; or of when he might be rescued, I'm willing to cut him the same slack the ones in the top picture get.
The food in those groceries is doomed. The perishables will perish and the semi-durable (canned goods) will probably be unsalvageable by the time they get the waters out of the city for not only are the pumps not capable of more than an inch an hour (as I recall reading) but they put the water into Lake Ponchartrain, which would be, until they repair the levee breaches, a Sysiphean task, since it will just run right back into town, charging anyone with looting; for food, is pointless, but the distinctions made here... sigh.
no subject
That's just wonderful.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
No implication of looting.
I am amused to note that the pic
Food/water/medicine, I cut slack.
A dozen pairs of jeans?
Not so much.
no subject
If they want to paint people scavenging food as looters, fine (we disagree, but fine) but to say the black ones are looters, and the white ones are merely doing what they have to to stay alive is wrong.
It implies the black ones are supposed to sit on their asses and wait for help, or just roll over and die.
Which is bullshit.
TK
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
The average person is going to see a white woman.
TK
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
image sources
Re: image sources
Re: image sources
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
There are times when journalists really, really annoy me.
no subject
If they said everyone who snagged something, no matter what it was, was looting, then fine. We disagree, but fine.
To make a distinction, absent some evidence, between two people taking the same sorts of things, well that's a horse of a different color.
TK
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
TK
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Police not stoping looters
(Anonymous) - 2005-09-01 19:19 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
...
Some officers joined in taking whatever they could, including one New Orleans cop who loaded a shopping cart with a compact computer and a 27-inchn flat-screen television. Officers claimed there was nothing they could do to contain the anarchy, saying their radio communications have broken down and they had no direction from commanders. (http://blighty.multiply.com/journal/item/537)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I just said the very same thing to my husband. These people are trapped and the products will be unsalavageable anyway.
I watched the em arrest a woman with a shopping cart... filled with diapers.
That's just plain stupid.
no subject
no subject
TK
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(color unspecified)marketeering and hoarding to follow.
no subject
I just heard an estimate today that it's going to take 9 weeks for them to pump out the city after (if!) they get the levees fixed. 4 weeks in, a food hoarder has food, what do you have? I wouldn't really care if I'd appropriated jeans/tvs/jelly beans/shiny objects/Nikes as long as they're scarce goods that I can use to barter for my necessities. I believe it would be much more stable philosophical ground to pin the distinction on need and quantity, although both of those are pretty 'best-guess' numbers considering the current state of things.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
However the girl in the first picture looks Asian. So if there is racism involved, is it aimed at black people only?
no subject
Sounds like you got more than one level of messed-the-fuck-up discrimination here.
More Color Coded News
no subject
I haven't looked into it myself, but a friend of mine who is fairly knowledgable about the media pointed out some problems with the comparisons above. First, the photos and captions came from two totally different news sources. Apparently AP has been consistent about calling everybody, regardless of race, a looter, whereas AFP has called people finders or looters pretty much at random, without a strict adherence to skin colour for either group. As mentioned, I cannot back up this observation, but it might be worth checking out.
What's wrong with this picture?
(Anonymous) 2005-09-01 11:49 am (UTC)(link)Looting is transition to freedom
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030411-010551-6382r
Well, there is an interesting detail here ...
(Anonymous) 2005-09-02 07:15 pm (UTC)(link)But then in a well organized place some ''authority'' would have arranged for confiscation and explicit distribution of such perishables, again under a state of necessity. But it is perhaps too much to ask that of a place like New Orleans...
finding vs looting
and somebody has:
http://www.snopes.com/photos/katrina/looters.asp
Re: finding vs looting
The problem is first, no matter what the photographer thinks of the situation, it isn't looting until someone gets convicted, which makes it libel per se.
libel per se
n. broadcast or written publication of a false statement about another which accuses him/her of a crime, immoral acts, inability to perform his/her profession, having a loathsome disease (like syphilis) or dishonesty in business. Such claims are considered so obviously harmful that malice need not be proved to obtain a judgment for "general damages," and not just specific losses.
Which isn't really the point, but something he (or his editor) ought to have taken into account.
The second is that pictures say more than words. Even as illustration of a piece of text, the picture dominates. The editor ought to think about that (I did, when I was selecting photos). Choosing a black kid, and calling him a looter is a bad idea.
There will be other photos, and unless they all say everyone who has anything in their hands is looting, then the appearance of editorial decision to say blacks are looting, and whites aren't, will occur.
And it did.
TK
These Pics
(Anonymous) 2005-09-09 07:20 pm (UTC)(link)