How to out oneself
Over in
matociquala's journal she made a post about rock-climbing, which had a passing comment on how Criminal Minds had managed to deconstruct a bit of the male gaze in its most recent episode.
It was the passing comment which led to the amusements. Setsuled asked a reasonable question. Bear responded, and as is her wont (and right, and privilege) she teased
setsuled about how easy it might have been to look it up.
In the course of the subsequent responses (to which I added a few words) it became plain the user was unclear on a few basic concepts (not all of which are things one would be expected to know; though some are ones which the engaged participant would be expected to delve into).
It also became plain the user has a very subtle form of male-privilege, one which might work fairly well in the general run of the world, but was doomed to end up in disaster in a place like Bear's journal.
The things about which he was unaware were all asked with a reasonableness that hid the nature of his exploitation of privilege. If the conversation hadn't kept going, his misogyny might have remained hidden.
It was an interesting unfolding (and you are abjured from wading in to make comments. The subject, insofar as he is concerned is closed. Make your own call on substantive addressing of the issue, but he, and his comments, are a done deal there. I don't want to re-open it. Not only am I not trying to make a dogpile, but the poor thing isn't able to respond. That would make it rude to Bear, and unfair to him; so do me the favor, ok? Thanks).
The initial comments weren't too bad. There was something bothersome about them, but they weren't offensive. Just a trifle privileged, and even that was subtle. One got the feelng he was well meaning, but not well-informed.
As time went on, he got more defensive, and more dismissive, and (qu'elle surprise) evinced more use of privilege. Then he tied the rope around his neck, with an inappropriate comment.
He could have pulled back from the edge. In fact he seemed to, but not quite. And then he jumped. He got pissy about people pointing out he was being, not just rough and tumble in debate, but rude.
As I said, it's an interesting case study in someone outing themselves; from nice guy, to "Nice Guy" to jerk, to asshole, to banned, all in one day.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It was the passing comment which led to the amusements. Setsuled asked a reasonable question. Bear responded, and as is her wont (and right, and privilege) she teased
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
In the course of the subsequent responses (to which I added a few words) it became plain the user was unclear on a few basic concepts (not all of which are things one would be expected to know; though some are ones which the engaged participant would be expected to delve into).
It also became plain the user has a very subtle form of male-privilege, one which might work fairly well in the general run of the world, but was doomed to end up in disaster in a place like Bear's journal.
The things about which he was unaware were all asked with a reasonableness that hid the nature of his exploitation of privilege. If the conversation hadn't kept going, his misogyny might have remained hidden.
It was an interesting unfolding (and you are abjured from wading in to make comments. The subject, insofar as he is concerned is closed. Make your own call on substantive addressing of the issue, but he, and his comments, are a done deal there. I don't want to re-open it. Not only am I not trying to make a dogpile, but the poor thing isn't able to respond. That would make it rude to Bear, and unfair to him; so do me the favor, ok? Thanks).
The initial comments weren't too bad. There was something bothersome about them, but they weren't offensive. Just a trifle privileged, and even that was subtle. One got the feelng he was well meaning, but not well-informed.
As time went on, he got more defensive, and more dismissive, and (qu'elle surprise) evinced more use of privilege. Then he tied the rope around his neck, with an inappropriate comment.
He could have pulled back from the edge. In fact he seemed to, but not quite. And then he jumped. He got pissy about people pointing out he was being, not just rough and tumble in debate, but rude.
As I said, it's an interesting case study in someone outing themselves; from nice guy, to "Nice Guy" to jerk, to asshole, to banned, all in one day.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
Now? Wow, what a jerk. He went downhill quickly and seemed to relish digging the hole deeper. Any sympathy I had is gone.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I now owe me twenty Internet Dollarz.
But I never ever would have expected the degree to which he'd self-destruct. I mean, seriously, inappropriately sexualizing a woman on her own LJ to win points in an Internet Slap Fight? Dumb. Doing it to Ebear and trying to blow it off as her being too thin skinned? Felony Stupid.
(no subject)
no subject
I've seen folks go through that same process on Pandagon a few times, but you're right; it was a nice, self-contained, crystalized example, and nested (unlike Pandagon).
(no subject)
I think I am in love with that thread
solely for
Re: I think I am in love with that thread
Re: I think I am in love with that thread
Re: I think I am in love with that thread
Re: I think I am in love with that thread
Re: I think I am in love with that thread
no subject
no subject
Ahh, but not mad at him for any reason. Coming in with a "your so gay" comment would have that effect, but not in a satisfying way. No, I think the enjoyment comes from playing intellectual martyr. "Their definitions were unsound," he thinks, "so I questioned them. All I cared about was the truth. Like Socrates, man. Like Galileo." The trouble is that what's really happening is not that he's applying cold, merciless logic to what people say to him: he's actually just responding with a dismissive smirk, and then brainstorming a follow-up question by picking semantic nits so that it sounds like he's being all Socratic.
I knew so damn many people in high school who loved playing that game. Most of them grew out of it.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
The Lord's Cross Might Redeem us, but our own just wastes our time...
Re: The Lord's Cross Might Redeem us, but our own just wastes our time...
Re: The Lord's Cross Might Redeem us, but our own just wastes our time...
I knew it was impossible, but...
This ain't no easy weekend...
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
It really bothers me when people treat the theoretical constructs of feminist and so-called 'critical' theory as if they are objective facts about the world.
Bear in her first reply says:
Really? Er, dude? I am female. And yet, the doubts, I can haz them.
If I had watched in real time, I would undoubtedly have ruffled my share of feathers, and not out of any male privilege but out of deep fucking annoyance that (yet again) the followers of Post Modern theory act as if no one can can discuss anything unless they first become versed in, and believers of, same.
GAAAAAAAAH. As far as I can tell, Post Modernism has the singular capacity to turn anyone who buys into it into a self-righteous asshole.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
...
Wow, he did.
That's some impressive WTFery right there.