[Error: Irreparable invalid markup ('<ias [...] evie.>') in entry. Owner must fix manually. Raw contents below.]
<iAs for the social breakdown = anarchy, you might wanna listen to a certain masked insurrectionist, currently being played by Hugo Weaving: "This isn't anarchy, Evie. This is chaos." Lotta folks conflate the two. <b>Society is not government, and can (and has, on many many occasions) get along just fine without it. </i></b>
Examples please. Nation states, perhaps, can be done without, but the social contract <i>is</i>government. It may be small, but lack of rules/laws, is chaos. Where there is no limit to what someone can do, someone will act without limit. That will spread.
And, for all that it may seem that way, I am not advocating, per se, armed liberals (though I am not against it). What I am arguing against is the idea that the Right is no worse than the Left when it comes to eliminationist rhetoric.
no subject
Examples please. Nation states, perhaps, can be done without, but the social contract <i>is</i>government. It may be small, but lack of rules/laws, is chaos. Where there is no limit to what someone can do, someone will act without limit. That will spread.
And, for all that it may seem that way, I am not advocating, per se, armed liberals (though I am not against it). What I am arguing against is the idea that the Right is no worse than the Left when it comes to eliminationist rhetoric.
TK