Pixel Stained
South Carolina has just passed a law requiring, "subversive agents" to register Subversive Agent Registration Form(pdf), with the Secretary of State.

Subversive agent is a pretty broad category, in this law.

Check the appropriate box.
Do you or your organization directly or indirectly advocate, advise, teach or practice the duty or necessity of controlling, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, the state of South Carolina or any political division thereof?
[ ] YES [ ] NO


Penalties for failing to register are a fine of up to 25,000 dollars and as much as ten years in prison.

I wonder how many member of the Americans for a Republican Majority, etc. will register.

Wedding

Feb. 7th, 2010 10:47 pm
Hat
Was most excellent. Had a great time, wish I wasn't heading home so soon. :(

Brides were lovely. Groom was gorgeous, much dressing up, dancing, singing, mirthing.

Would not have missed it for the world.

For the win

Feb. 2nd, 2010 06:07 am
Hat
About a month ago I got a message on Flickr saying Schmap Guides (a sort of online Baedeker) was interested in using one of my photos. I looked at the terms, and decided they were acceptable to me (no money, but credit, links and [most important to me] limited use; solely for the guide).

Today they let me know they had decided to use it.

Schmap's Guide to the Monterey Bay Aquarium

There's even an iPhone app.
Pixel Stained
Mesopotamia 1917

They shall not return to us, the resolute, the young,
The eager and whole-hearted whom we gave:
But the men who left them thriftily to die in their own dung,
Shall they come with years and honour to the grave?

They shall not return to us, the strong men coldly slain
In sight of help denied from day to day:
But the men who edged their agonies and chid them in their pain,
Are they too strong and wise to put away?

Our dead shall not return to us while Day and Night divide -
Never while the bars of sunset hold.
But the idle-minded overlings who quibbled while they died,
Shall they thrust for high employments as of old?

Shall we only threaten and be angry for an hour?
When the storm is ended shall we find
How softly but how swiftly they have sidled back to power
By the favour and contrivance of their kind?

Even while they soothe us, while they promise large amends,
Even while they make a show of fear,
Do they call upon their debtors, and take counsel with their friends,
To confirm and re-establish each career?

Their lives cannot repay us - their death could not undo -
The shame that they have laid upon our race.
But the slothfulness that wasted and the arrogance that slew,
Shall we leave it unabated in its place?
Hat
Wait... it's not to the tune of O! Tannenbaum?

Crap.

I am on my way to the airport, and thence to Ottawa for ten days. Mid-term went well. News when I land.
camo at halloween
The CIA agent who was fêon;ted by the torture apologists for saying torture worked... well, just as I said: he lied.

As reported by Foreign Policy, he's recanted.

Indeed. But after his one-paragraph confession, Kiriakou adds that he didn't have any first hand knowledge of anything relating to CIA torture routines, and still doesn't. And he claims that the disinformation he helped spread was a CIA dirty trick: "In retrospect, it was a valuable lesson in how the CIA uses the fine arts of deception even among its own."

I told you so.

Cookery

Jan. 27th, 2010 09:26 pm
Hat
CG has started to take in a CSA box. So far it's been sort of dull, mostly winter vegetables, and not many. Some boring oranges, and avacados she doesn't care for. A butterut squash, etc.

This week included some chard, and a fair bit of young bok choy. She wondered what we could do with that and my mind started down some flights of fancy. Most people don't care for chard much, but I've had it, or collards, as filling in rolled roasts (very good when served cold in a picnic; sometime I must discuss the art of the picnic; a good place to start is The Wind in the Willows which has a splendid one, right there in in chapter one. It's enough to make one which it was spring, and one could just say, "Oh bother," and dash off to the river and spend the day messing about in boats), but I digress.

So we trotted to the market and bought some flank steak, a onion, some beers (an Anderson Valley Belgian style, "Brother David's Triple" and a bottle from Belgium, Lousberg).

Back home. I was going to make a variation on carbonnade. Set an onion to caramelise, and wilt some chard (sliced off the ribs, and then into thin strips) with a bit of chicken broth in the microwave. Roll a bit of flanken around the wilted kale and some minced onion. Brown that in some bacon fat (the bacon I added to the onion in the saucier). Add the Triple, and some russet potato (I wanted the russet to break down and add body to the beer/broth). Some new potatos, and another onion, cut large.

In a bit, add some carrots, and a tomato. Just before it was done (about an hour on a low fire) put some bok choy in to wilt, toss in the caramelised onions and open the Louberg to drink with it.
Pixel Stained
I'm not going to talk about Citizen's Untited v FEC. (with its tortured extension of the dicta in Union Pacific v Santa Clara Co.. I think it's a bad thing, and I think the effect is, in the short term, not going to be as great as feared. Sandra Day O'Connor does point out the real place we might want to make a correction to ameliorate the possible evils of it is the idea of electing judges.

I will say, before I move onto the really important decision recently handed down, that this isn't a "free speech issue", no matter how it's cast. The restriction was, "content neutral" which has long been the test of allowable restriction (Yes, there is also the "clear and present danger" doctrine of Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., but I think that a weaker precedent, even if more widely known and accepted). The complaint here was that the law, in all its majesty was forbidding both rich and poor alike from sleeping under bridges. It just happens the rich wanted to sleep under these bridges.

But the folly I want to talk about is Dred Scott v Sanders, because the Supreme Court, in esssence, recreated a class of, "non-persons" in the law. Last month (mid-Dec, 2009) they let stand a lower court ruling, which held that prisoners in Guantanamo aren't persons in the law.

The case was brought under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which applies to all persons. Since the court said it didn't apply, the prisoners in question aren't legal persons.

Worse, the Court said that claims to protection under the Geneva Conventions and the Alien Tort Statute weren't valid becase, "torture is a foreseeable consequence of the military’s detention of suspected enemy combatants.". [emphasis added].

There are a couple of things there which ought to give one pause. One, the lack of being a person in the law. There are a lot of things which that covers. Most of the Bill of Rights are rights of persons, and the main holding in Dred Scott was that slaves, not being legal persons, had no rights.

Secondly, ignore (if you can) that a US Court said torture was acceptable, note the use of the word suspected. Not convicted, not even proven, but suspected.

Third, ponder that anyone can be put in this legal non-person state. If you don't think it can happen to a citizen (who most certainly is a person in the law) go back and review the case of Jose Padilla.

Then look at this, Der Liebermouse demands suspect be declared terrorist and stripped of rights "“We write to urge the administration to immediately transfer Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab, a foreign terrorist, to the Department of Defense to be held as an unprivileged enemy belligerent (UEB) and questioned and charged accordingly.”

"Questioned and charged accordingly," and, ""torture is a foreseeable consequence of the military’s detention of suspected enemy combatants."

I worry more about that than I do about poltical advertsing.
Pixel Stained
The Senate is an arcane place. The myth is the members are all friendly to one another, and that collegial nature allows them to be more deliberative than the House, where the short terms, and the dissolution of that body, every two years, prevents "Statesmanlike behavior".

This is, of course, nonsense. The standing committees, the tenure of long incumbency, all combine to make the amount of deliberation the House does about the same as that for the Senate.

More relevant, the legislative cycle for both is the same. When the House is dissolved every two years, all the bills the Senate might have gotten passed are dead; because they can't be reconciled to a House Bill. It all has to start over (in theory they could just present the same bill again; but some of the senators might not still be on board, and it takes time from new business).

In, and of themselves, those myths wouldn't be too pernicious. The problem is the newer myth that, "it takes 60 votes to pass something out of the Senate," which is gaining new traction as Brown's win in Mass. means the Republicans again have a 41 member caucus (though, to be honest, with Der Liebermaus [I-Lieberman], and Nelson (D Neb.), they have had an effective 42 votes in favor of gridlock on pretty much anything the Republican party doesn't like. It doesn't matter the least little bit how they vote on bills, if they keep working to keep bills they know will win; and they don't want to vote on from being put to the question).

Fact 1: The Senate passes a bill by simpe majority.

Fact 2: The filibuster allows a principled minority to stymie a piece of legislation.

Fact 3: (this is the important part) Changes in the rules, back in the '70s made a filibuster almost risk free to the people waging it.

See, back in the bad old days, a filibuster prevented the senate from getting any work done. The business of legislating came to a complete stop because the floor was being held. So they changed the rules. Filibusters, when actually being done, took up the morning session, and then the bill in question would be tabled and other things could be addressed.

Which pulled the teeth of the filibuster's possible backlash. There things sat, for a good long time, with both parties keeping the big guns of the procedural armory in check, pretty much. Until the aftermath of the Contract With America crowd. I think most of the evils of the present partisan mess stem from that huge swath of not merely freshmen Representatives, but the neophyte nature of a lot of them to holding office. It made them a lot more partisan, and less aware of what is needed to keep a pluralistic nation afloat. A number of them moved on to the senate, and the machines they built were built by people with blinders, but I digress.

So when Bush/Cheney were being threatened with actual fiibusters, the goons working with them (Lott, et al.) threatened to change the rules of the senate; which is a lot easier than stopping a filibuster. They called it the nuclear option, and it would have made a filibuster a lot harder to just get away with. The Dems caved, and lo! when the Republicans (those paragons of the, "up or down vote") became the minority, the number of filibusters engaged in went through the roof.

The amazing part of the way the game played out was the Dems took it on the chin. The obstructionist Republicans went around saying, "they have the majority, and they can't get anything done." The one occasion when Reid said, "Break out the cots, we're going into special session," they flinched. The last thing they seemed to want was to be seen for what they were (shades of the folks defending Prop. 8. Cameras in the courtroom? The HORROR. Lists of who it was who actually made public contributions to the funding behind Prop 8? A disaster), accountability for what they were doing was anatheman to them.

Reid, of course, didn't take it to heart. All he had to do to make the pain of throttled legislation stop, was make the Republicans actually show what things they were against. Make them stake some claim to principles larger than, "preventing the Democratic Party from doing anything."

Now, with the election of Brown, we have to listen to all that balderdash about, "the needed 60 votes to get anything done in the Senate."

Well, it ain't so. All that needs to happen is to use a tactical nuke. Don't change the number on cloture. Let them have their ability to hold the floor open. But make it a real filibuster again. None of this gentlemen's agreement to have morning filibusters and afternoon sessions. Nope.

Just go back to the old ways of standing up and talking, out in the open, where the public can see what they are for, and against. If they have uch strong principles they will be glad to have them on display.

And the filibuster will, once again, be something which has some claim to merit.
Pixel Stained
Are they bloody daft? The real thing in Mass. was healthcare, and Obama (with Reid and Pelosi's help) giving the store to the insurance and pharmaceutical industries.

As they built the bill, the Republicans want it to pass, because the dog's breakfast they've created will please no one. Add that they are wimps when in... the minority, and allow the republicans to be bullies (when the Dems have the majority) and the results are a disaster.

Look at the polling: the US is a center left country (this is when you poll on issues, divorced of party), and the Republicans are a kleptocratic bunch of very right wing types and we are headed for failed state status.

Bowing to the Fox News agitprop wing of the Republican Party will only serve to more fully marginilize them. They need to grow some gonads and make a real difference beteween the parties.

I've seen things where the message the party is taking from this is, "We are too left, we have to move more 'to the center.'" Bullshit. The lesson to take from this is that when one's constituency is pissed off they vote for someone else, and situationally in the US there is only one other party to vote for. Becoming more like that party isn't going to make your constinuency happier with you, and gormless examples of spineless pandering isn't going to win votes from the other side.

That comes across as nothing more than a craven desire to suck on the public teat.

If they want to keep the votes of the people who aren't Republicans... they have to stop acting like Republicans.
Hat
The MSF course. It was good, Mountain View Los Altos Adult School has a well structured application of the curriculum. The course requirements are state mandated. If you pass the course you don't have to take the skills test at the DMV. Take the written, and present the Certificate nd you have your license(or, as in my case, take the written, do some road-time on the permit, and take the course and go back with the certifcate).

I reccomend the course. It's not just that an app't to take the skills test can be as much as three months from when you make it, but the things being tested tend to be things newer riders don't want to practice, and more experienced riders don't tend to. Slow speed work. Also those skills are easier on a bike which is slghtly smaller than most people want as working bikes (250cc is fine for about town, but a bit light, and usually smaller than is comfortable for longer riding).

The course is 20 hours. About 9 hours of classroom time, and about 9 hours of riding time (and about an hour a day for lunch). That's a lot. I've seen several ways of organising the time, with lectures on weeknights, and then a session on the range the following Saturday; done across two weeks.

I've also seen a Tues/Thus schedule for the classroom, and an all day session for the riding, and a Saturday classroom/Sunday range.

MVLA did it as mornings in the classroom, and afternoons on the range (Sat/Sun). As a teacher I like that. As a student I like it.

Saturday was controls, and basics of handling. That gave us a chance to absorb a fair bit of material, and get some idea of how the bike was going to handle (we were shown a selection of bikes, from cruisers to enduros. I took a plain street bike). We also got a feel for how the coaches did things. Then it was basics. Starting, feeling the clutch, getting an understanding of when the bike is self-stable (motorcycles need about 7 mph to keep themselves up. Lower than that the rider has to keep them up with balance, but when accelerating the are functionally about 3 mph, so about the time your feet are behind your butt, you can pick them up).

Some straightaway, a bit of turning, up to second, stopping, leaning, doing things to the left and right, weaving the bike, etc. made up the afternoon.

Next day, with the threat of rain, classes on how the road works (and how much more alcohol affects bike-riders), and we headed to the range again. The threat was fulfilled and we spent the first half of the afternoon being drizzled and pelted (but never pounded).

For all the slight discomfort (I have good raingear, a jacket; meant for motorcycles, which fits over my actual leather jacket, and gortex trousers; which use suspenders, so only the boots and gloves were vulnerable to the rain), wet pavement on the second day was probably to the good. We were all a bit more hesitant, but we also know we can stop on wet pavement, and corner, and swerve, and all the other things we need to be able to do.

And a night of rest, to let new skills firm up, and time to ponder what we learned, in the context of what we needed to learn. That was a good thing.

And so we spent the afternoon with harder things (and some refresh of things done the day before). At the end of the day we had the spectre of the test (we'd already taken the written exam). I felt better, but for some reason the clutch on my bike stopped liking me (to be fair, I didn't like the throttle. The placement was such that proper hand position was uncomfortable, and didn't have as much fine control at the start as I'd like. Some of the problem was pedagogical. One of the mandated requirements is hand position, on throttle and clutch. The clutch has to be covered with all four fingers, that's a strain. Add a bit of cold and my muscles were tired, so I wasn't feathering as well as I'd been, and the I was being too ginger with the throttle, which meant the more aggressive clutch release was too much for the motor to absorb).

The part of the test I was worried about was the constrained U-turns. We had to execute two of them (a figure-8), in a limited space. Roll out of the box, and get docked. Put a foot down, and get docked. I'd been having troubles with my foot dropping in the second one. Sure enough; despite having greased it, and known why I did, what my problems were when I was dropping my foot, I had to set one down.

Chester (who was on a cruiser) had a bit more trouble, and dropped the bike. Disqualified.

I didn't have any real worries in the rest of the test. I was a trifle too cautious, and that cost me points. I didn't like the rear brakes, and one of the test points is the shortness of a stop. Since anticipating the stop is a semi-ding, I think I started a little late, and was a little easy on the rear brake. Since I didn't want to use it, I was also not as mentally collected as could have been (the drill is, lose sight of the cones, drop the throttle, get on the front brake, and get on the rear brake. I had to keep my mind on making sure I got on the rear brake). I was a little longer than no-ding.

Gregory went too long, and anticipated the stop. He had to test it twice. That's not good, since the second time there are more ways to get penalty points (the first time you anticipate the stop, it's not counted. You can have a zero-default first run [if I understood the scoring correctly] and still have to re-test the event).

Then the last, negotiating a curve. Take off, get to second, enter the first curve, speed up out of it (up to about 17 mph), slow for the second curve, enter; speed up, and come out; while not leaving the marked path. Straighten the bike and stop.

From when you enter the curve to the end, it's timed. I was worried about slipping on the wet pavement and didn't roll on enough throttle, so I was a trifle slow. They also didn't think I engaged the rear brake when slowing for the curve (though I did choose an appropriate speed to enter).

All said and done, I was a go. Doug, who did my grading, didn't really fault my choices, but they weren't inside the standards.

All in all, I'm a better rider for it. I didn't learn any new skills, but I did get a lot of practice. I also added a skill set (wet roads, with a powered bike) to the skills I do have. That I got all the corrective feedback, very good for the general confidence.

But it was a tiring couple of days. Riding a bike is a bit of phsycical work. Standing with a bike, and dismouting, remounting, picking the feet up, and putting them down, walking it (we spent a lot of time in line, moving forward a bike length) all of that takes energy. We also had the wet and the cold.

So I went home, grabbed a shower to warm up, and headed to work for inventory. I was expecting a late night. Home about 0100. No. The system which was used last year was revamped. Instead of counting everything in the store (and there is a lot in the store. We had more than 1,500 marked sections to count. I am amazed to realise how much I know; since I can pretty much tell someone if we have something, and where it is), we had to count it twice. We also had to audit the count; at least 10 percent, and some specific areas; also each person doing inventory had to be audited to be sure they were accurate.

When I say we had to count it twice... the scanner tallied the counts we gave it, then asked us to tell us how many objects were in the section. If the numbers didn't match, you had to start that section over.

About 0330 I started to go weak in the knees. I'd been up since 0600, and spent much of the past two days on my feet, holding up a 200 lb. motorcycle. I was beat. I finally called it a night at 0430. I'd been at the store for 11 hours. Home to bed, and thank goodness I wasn't required to be anywhere, because I awoke at 1030, and my brains were mush, and my lower body sort of rubbery.

But, I'd do it again. It was a good time at work, even if it ran too long (when I left there were eight people still there). It gave a chance to do some chatter, and relax with people I don't get to see much in a context where we can just have a conversation. They were still a bit short (the counting had to be done) but taking a dinner break, and just hanging out was good. The sense of shared adversity was also nice (then again, I probably have a warped fondness for that sort of bonding, because so much of being in the Army requires rising above situational stress to get the job done).

But being in nothing but school today... that's pretty nice too, even if it is raining on me.
Loch Icon
I am dashing off a quick note before I head to work to do inventory.

I spent the past two days taking a 20 hour motorcycle skills course; it rained today. I passed. Passing is good, it means I can get my actual license by just walking into the DMV and handing in a form. I don't have to wait 2-3 months to arrange a test date.

And the test for the MSF waiver is a lot harder than the DMV test, so all in all the 250 bucks was money well spent. Lots of practice at things which one isn't as likely to attentively practice/be aware of, and a lot (about ten hours) of slow, and mentored, work on basic skills.

So I am a better rider for it too.

But I am tired, (and stressed, the test was amazingly nervous-making). I didn't do as well on the practical as I would have liked, but my major failures were of caution, so as things to screw up go, that's to the better.

In a class of seven, we had four pass (and one person who was retesting failed again; so eight took the test, half failed). I guess I can be proud of myself.
Hat
Chuck Norris is on a mission

You have to go read it, but the highlights are just precious.

The White House explained that it put out no initial statement about the president's executive order because it viewed the matter as benign and uninteresting. "There is nothing newsworthy here," said Christina Reynolds, a White House spokeswoman.

But was that really the case? "Nothing newsworthy?" Or was there some reason the White House was trying to slip the executive order under the radar from the media and public's notice during the Christmas rush so that few would notice?


right... because everyone waits, with bated breath, to find out what the latest excutive order is.

This one exempts Interpol's New York office from FOIA requests. Why? I'd guess it's because Interpol is an agency which collates police reports on working investigations and those are full of things like informant information (you know, the ID of people who are acting as sources and moles in the course of investigations of things like plots to blow up airplanes with homemade bombs).

But maybe I'm just being naive. Chuck will explain it all if we let him.

Is it merely coincidental that Obama signed this executive Interpol order and that New York is the feds' city of choice to place 9/11 terrorists on trial in federal court?

Is it merely coincidental that Obama signed this executive Interpol order and that, if for any reason the White House can't give terrorist detainees U.S. constitutional privileges by being tried in civilian courts, they now have the close proximity of Interpol archives that are exempt from American legal or investigative discovery?

Is it merely a coincidence Obama signed this executive Interpol order that now makes Interpol exempt from Freedom of Information Act, or FOIA, requests by U.S. citizens?

Is it merely coincidental that Obama signed this executive Interpol order and that the feds want to try these 9/11 terrorists in civilian courts rather than military courts, and undoubtedly don't want to lose the cases in public opinion by the dissemination of the trials' details and evidence?

Is it merely coincidental that Obama signed this executive Interpol order and that Interpol's U.S. central operations office is under the umbrella and within our own Justice Department offices? (Interpol, which was started in 1923 and is made up of 188 country members including the U.S., has a bureau in the Department of Justice.)


Yes.

There's a lot more of that, but it's even less coherent. I like the, "is it merely co-incidental." Nice bit of schtick. He gets to insinuate, and make his non-sensical accuasations, all in the guise of wondering about co-incidences which only exist because he happend to make them up.

Is it merely co-incidence that he listens to Glenn Beck and then comes up with this sort of balderdash?

Again, threatwatch.org hit the nail on the head: Immunity from search and seizure "cannot be understated, because this immunity and protection – and elevation above the U.S. Constitution – afforded Interpol is likely a precursor to the White House subjecting the United States under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC). Interpol provides a significant enforcement function for the ICC, just as our FBI provides a significant function for our Department of Justice."

Um... no. Interpol has no enforcement arm, anywhere. They can't arrest anyone. They are an intel-agency. They are not the FBI of the ICC.

I suspect the real reason is pretty straightforward, just think of the co-indicences likely to happen if Chuck were able to file FOIA requests on those offices.
Loch Icon
Yesterday I was at the VA. It was one of the hardest days of my life. Not phsycially, not mentally, but emotionally.

It was my interview/physical exam for the question: How disabled is Staff Sergeant Karney.

The interview took a bit more than an hour. Draining. I don't like to think of myself as being damaged/handicapped/disabled. I am. I know I am. I am reminded of it every day. The pills, the aches, the things I can't do as well as I used to (ride horses, hike, open jars); all of those combine to make it plain to me that I am not completely whole.

But to list every one of them, to haul my mind back to the beginning, and recount the onset, and the various pains and indignities my disease inflicted, and continues to inflict... that was new.

I left, and went to get some brekkie. I called CG and asked if she wanted to join me, because I needed a comforting presence. I didn't eat but a bit of my cheescake, and probably rambled about tings which didn't really relate to the problems on my mind.

Then I went back; for the exam.

That took longer. I know why she was so thorough, it's a big deal, and all they really have to go on is the records on file, my testimony about how things are for me, and the exam.

I've seen questionable horses, being purchased by dubious buyers which were less carefull examined. She was friendly, and warm, and probably has as good a beside manner as anyone could hope for.

But it was still more than an hour of being on a table in my nothing by my undershorts, while I was poked, prodded, twisted, folded, bent and brushed. I am more sore on my right, less mobile on my right. I can push better than I can pull. It's possible I have Reynaud's Disease.

I went back to CGs and made dinner, talked about random stuff, and passed out. Slept like a log, and headed to school.

I'm broken. I'm not destroyed. I may (almost certainly, actually) be completely fit again. It sucks. I hate it.

So what? I've been stuck in a strange head space for the past 6 years. Some of it mild PTSD, some of it denial, some of it minor self-pity.

Ok, that was bad. Some of it is still bad. Today is what it is, and that's as much as I am gonna get. One foot in front of the other and keep on moving.

I ain't dead, so we call it a win.
Hat
Marna is going to be visiting in March/April.

Les and I feel she should be fêted in the manner she so richly deserves; ergo we are going to be having a party.

Where: E. Palo Alto.
When: March 27 (exact hours TBA; probably afternoon early evening).

There will be nibblies, etc. A grill is available. I will probably make various things. Details are far from settled, but there will be a shin-dig.

If you are interested in showing up, let us know.
Hat
A few weeks ago I made supper for Les and Minimo. I was at Mollie Stones, pondering protein, and saw they had wild Coho on sale. So I bought about a half pound. I am not a fan of cooked salmon. Les saw it, and was surprised.

I told her there was enough other food to keep me happy, and that I was going to have a bite, and see what I thought of it. I too the thin slice of the filet, and it wasn't bad. I liked the browned side.

Skip forward to a week ago. I didn't have the energy to deal with sardines (not quite the physical, the detail work of pulling the backbone; and decidely not the mental to come up with something more novel than the various things I've done to butterflied fish).

I saw that whole foods had a decent price (not the 7.99 a lb Mollie Stone's had, but reasonable), and I had Jaqui; my fishmonger, give me a piece of about 3/4s of a pound. CG likes it. Darrell likes it. I liked it when it was slightly crisped. I could try a variation, and see what I thought of it.

CG had plans involving a dish of roast beets and fennel root, I was going to make some tatties ad neeps.

Got home. CG put the beets in the oven. We sliced the fennel root. When the beets were half done we put the fennel root in, julienned; with the parsnips (cut into rounds) underneath.

Those came out, the potatoes were mashed, the neeps cut bite sized and folded in.

I got the cast-iron hot, and tossed the salmon in, flesh-side down, and cooked it until the slim part of the filet was cooked through. I cut that off (it was my part) and put the skin side into a skillet, full of heated saké, to poach until done.
WHile this was going on CG peeled the beets, sliced them and tossed them with the fennel, and some romaine, with some parmesan, olive oil and 12 year old balsamic.

We drank it with a very fruity cider and it was damned good.
Hat
That we get the love we get.

I was going to write you a love letter tonight.
But I was restless
and I missed you
And I knew you were
coming soon.
So I washed your sweater and
aired out your coat and
waterproofed your boots and
hung up
your pants and found your socks and
all I wrote was I love you in cotton
I miss you in wool
Come back in black
shoe polish.
camo at halloween
In addition to the eight civlians (be they OGA, or contractors) who were killed yesterday, I just heard (on the Rachel Maddow Show) that four Candian Soldiers were killed today.

The odds are slim that they were friends of mine, but I have friends in the Candian Army/Navy.

There really isn't anything else to say.

Here's to absent friends, to us, and them's like us.

Damned few left.

Travels

Dec. 30th, 2009 09:31 am
Hat
I am in LA for the next couple of days. I wasn't planning to be, but I figured I wanted to see some people over New Years. A sort of gentle wake, since I'm going to a party where there will be people who knew Ken.

Today I have to go to the mortuary, and take care of some paperwork.

I have no spcific plans for the evening. I'll be in Arcadia tomorrow (and perhaps this afternoon, to pick up some clothes from the bunker, and visit the horses (I'd see Maia, but she's away at New Year's Gathering).

I don't know yet if I'm planning to leave Friday afternoon, or Sat. morning. I managed to take care of a quick errand in SLO on the way down. If I head home on Sat, I can leave in the early a.m., and take some time to grab some pictures on the coast.

So, if someone has interest, I have means to travel, and some time.

The trip down had a couple of amusements on the road. I had a tailgator, whom I realised was being erratic too. I changed lanes, and he pulled up to the minivan in front of me. Not close, not even danger close but insanely close. I'd say he was at less than eight feet behind the minivan, and wobbling in his lane.

I called 911. Didn't wait for them to answer, and learned that when 911 calls you back, your phone rings, even when it's on vibrate.

Later, in LA, I saw a motorcycle with no tail light. I was trying to figure out how to let him know he had a problem and wishing some sort of cop was around.

Which was when I saw the Highway Patrol Cruiser float up next to me. He saw the bike, and I was never so happy to see someone pulled over. Not Schadenfreude happy, but relieved.

Profile

Hat
pecunium

February 2010

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Layout Credit

Layout:
[personal profile] kaigou
Resources:
Circular Icons